Abstract
A three year field Irial was carried out 10 compare two agricultural land management sys·
tems, al Cavacurta (LO, Northern Italy). Conventionallillage (C11 and No-tillage (NT) were compared
cropping maize treated with three levels of nitrogen. TIle soil was a coarse·loamy over SIlndy, mixed, mesic
F/uvenlic Ustochrept (Soil Taxonomy, 1992), that had been under mixed sward for two years. The CT plots
were ploughed to 30 cm, and then harrowed twice wilh a rotating harrow. The NT plots were treated
with Glyphosate prior to sowing the maize on the residue of the previous crop. Experimental design was
a split·p lot with four replicates, w ith the management system as the main factor and the nitrogen fertilization
(0, 220 and 270 kg N ha·' year') as the secondary factor. NT could easily be used in the Po valley.
After a transition period, in which ni trogen fertil ization needed to be increased (30 kg N ha·'), grain and
tolal biomass yields of NT maize plants are equal 10 or higher than those obtained under a CT system.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | 198-205 |
Numero di pagine | 8 |
Rivista | AGRICOLTURA MEDITERRANEA |
Volume | 136 |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2006 |
Keywords
- N fertilizing
- Zea mays L.
- conventional tillage
- fertilizzazione azotata
- lavorazione convenzionale
- mais
- maize
- no-tillage
- non lavorazione