TY - JOUR
T1 - Worldwide Prevalence of the Lingual Canal in Mandibular Incisors: A Multicenter Cross-sectional Study with Meta-analysis
AU - Martins, Jorge N R
AU - Ensinas, Pablo
AU - Chan, Francis
AU - Babayeva, Narin
AU - von Zuben, Murilo
AU - Berti, Luiza
AU - Lam, Ernest WN
AU - Antúnez, Marcia
AU - Pei, Fan
AU - Mendez de la Espriella, Catalina
AU - Vargas, Walter
AU - Izquierdo Camacho, Juan Carlos
AU - Alkhawas, Moataz-Bellah AM
AU - Pimentel, Tiago
AU - Santiago, Fábio
AU - Herrmann, Hans Willi
AU - Chaniotis, Antonis
AU - Benyocs, Gergely
AU - Ragnarsson, Magnús F
AU - Kottoor, Jojo
AU - Shemesh, Avi
AU - Castagnola, Raffaella
AU - Tummala, Sriteja
AU - Matsunaga, Satoru
AU - Maksimova, Arina
AU - Ounsi, Hani
AU - Parolia, Abhishek
AU - Aguilar, Ruben Rosas
AU - Oderinu, Olabisi H
AU - Nazeer, Muhammad
AU - Heilborn, Carlos
AU - Nole, Christian
AU - Nicola, Sergiu
AU - Lipatova, Elena
AU - Alfawaz, Hussam
AU - Seedat, Hussein C
AU - Chang, Seok Woo
AU - Gonzalez, Jose Antonio
AU - Altaki, Zaher
AU - Banomyong, Danuchit
AU - Keles, Ali
AU - Modyeievsky, Iliana
AU - Monroe, Adam
AU - Boveda, Carlos
AU - Silva, Emmanuel JNL
AU - Solomonov, Michael
AU - Itzhak, Joe Ben
AU - Versiani, Marco A
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: This cross-sectional study assessed the influence of patient demographics on the worldwide prevalence of a lingual canal in mandibular incisors. Methods: Twenty-six thousand four hundred mandibular incisors were evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography imaging by precalibrated observers from 44 countries. A standardized screening method was employed to collect data on the presence of a lingual canal, the anatomic configuration of the root canal, and number of roots. Patient demographic information (age, sex, and ethnicity) was also recorded. Multiple intra and interrater tests assessed the reliability of the observers and groups, and a meta-analysis was used to examine differences and heterogeneities (α = 5%). Results: The prevalence of the lingual canal in mandibular central and lateral incisors varied from 2.3% (0.06%–4.0%; Nigeria) to 45.3% (39.7%–51.0%; Syria) and from 2.3% (0.06%–4.0%; Nigeria) to 55.0% (49.4%–60.6%; India), respectively. Ethnicity had a significant impact on the prevalence of the lingual canal, with African, Asian, and Hispanic groups having the lowest proportions (P < .05), while Caucasians, Indians, and Arabs showed the highest (P < .05) for both incisor groups. Additionally, males had a significantly higher odds ratio for both the central (1.334) and lateral (1.178) incisors, while older patients had a lower prevalence for both tooth groups (P < .05). The side and tooth group did not influence on the outcomes. Conclusions: The prevalence of lingual root canals in mandibular incisors varies significantly based on geographic location, ethnicity, age, and gender. The overall prevalence was 21.9% for mandibular central incisors and 26.0% for lateral incisors.
AB - Introduction: This cross-sectional study assessed the influence of patient demographics on the worldwide prevalence of a lingual canal in mandibular incisors. Methods: Twenty-six thousand four hundred mandibular incisors were evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography imaging by precalibrated observers from 44 countries. A standardized screening method was employed to collect data on the presence of a lingual canal, the anatomic configuration of the root canal, and number of roots. Patient demographic information (age, sex, and ethnicity) was also recorded. Multiple intra and interrater tests assessed the reliability of the observers and groups, and a meta-analysis was used to examine differences and heterogeneities (α = 5%). Results: The prevalence of the lingual canal in mandibular central and lateral incisors varied from 2.3% (0.06%–4.0%; Nigeria) to 45.3% (39.7%–51.0%; Syria) and from 2.3% (0.06%–4.0%; Nigeria) to 55.0% (49.4%–60.6%; India), respectively. Ethnicity had a significant impact on the prevalence of the lingual canal, with African, Asian, and Hispanic groups having the lowest proportions (P < .05), while Caucasians, Indians, and Arabs showed the highest (P < .05) for both incisor groups. Additionally, males had a significantly higher odds ratio for both the central (1.334) and lateral (1.178) incisors, while older patients had a lower prevalence for both tooth groups (P < .05). The side and tooth group did not influence on the outcomes. Conclusions: The prevalence of lingual root canals in mandibular incisors varies significantly based on geographic location, ethnicity, age, and gender. The overall prevalence was 21.9% for mandibular central incisors and 26.0% for lateral incisors.
KW - Anatomy
KW - cone-beam computed tomography
KW - cross-sectional study
KW - endodontics
KW - incisors
KW - meta-analysis
KW - Anatomy
KW - cone-beam computed tomography
KW - cross-sectional study
KW - endodontics
KW - incisors
KW - meta-analysis
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/313347
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85161636873&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85161636873&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2023.05.012
DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2023.05.012
M3 - Article
SN - 0099-2399
VL - 49
SP - 819
EP - 835
JO - Journal of Endodontics
JF - Journal of Endodontics
IS - 7
ER -