When the law is not enough. Caseworkers’ ideas of justice in practices

Rebecca Paraciani*, Tatiana Saruis

*Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

Drawing from Lipsky’s (1980) concept of street-level bureaucracy and the theories of justice (Rawls, 1971; Mashaw, 1983; Elster, 1992), this paper is focused on the dilemmas that social welfare services’ caseworkers face in their daily work. The field research is based on the collection and comparison of caseworkers’ narratives about complex cases. It was conducted within services located in the North and South of Europe: Bologna in Central Italy and Copenhagen in Denmark. Social work practices are analysed through caseworkers’ narratives to understand how their ideas influence the services. This study is intended to answer the following research questions: What challenges do caseworkers have to cope with? How do they manage their discretion to shape ‘fair’ decisions? What conditions and limits contribute to shaping the services’ final decisions? What principles of justice regulate the processing of cases, and thus what concrete ideas of social justice underpin the services?
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)163-182
Numero di pagine20
RivistaSociologia del Lavoro
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2019

Keywords

  • Principles of justice
  • Social welfare services
  • Storytelling approach
  • Street-level bureaucracy

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'When the law is not enough. Caseworkers’ ideas of justice in practices'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo