What Role for Overriding Mandatory Provisions of Third Countries in Conflicts of Laws Relating to Rights in Rem in Moveable Non-cultural Property?

Pietro Franzina

doi:10.37417/PILRIRUE/19

What Role for Overriding Mandatory Provisions of Third Countries in Conflicts of Laws Relating to Rights in Rem in Moveable Non-cultural Property?

Pietro Franzina

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in libro › Capitolo

Abstract

I. The current reflection on a possible EU instrument on the law governing rights in rem. – II. The unilateralist flavour of the lex rei sitae rule: is there any room left for overriding mandatory provisions in the field of rights in rem? - III. The recovery of illegally transferred non-cultural objects. – IV. The enforcement of duties pertaining to the moveable assets in question. – V. Concluding remarks.

Lingua originale	Inglese
Titolo della pubblicazione ospite	Private International Law on Rights in rem in the European Union. Derecho internacional privado sobre derechos reales en la Unión Europea
Editor	M. Font-Mas
Pagine	469-476
Numero di pagine	8
DOI	https://doi.org/10.37417/PILRIRUE/19
Stato di pubblicazione	Pubblicato - 2024

Keywords

Diritti reali
Diritto internazionale privato
Private international law
Rights in rem

Accesso al documento

10.37417/PILRIRUE/19

Altri file e collegamenti

Link a IRIS PubliCatt

Cita questo

Franzina, P. (2024). What Role for Overriding Mandatory Provisions of Third Countries in Conflicts of Laws Relating to Rights in Rem in Moveable Non-cultural Property? In M. Font-Mas (A cura di), Private International Law on Rights in rem in the European Union. Derecho internacional privado sobre derechos reales en la Unión Europea (pagg. 469-476) https://doi.org/10.37417/PILRIRUE/19

@inbook{2513ebbf32474268be978fa4096dec72,

title = "What Role for Overriding Mandatory Provisions of Third Countries in Conflicts of Laws Relating to Rights in Rem in Moveable Non-cultural Property?",

abstract = "I. The current reflection on a possible EU instrument on the law governing rights in rem. – II. The unilateralist flavour of the lex rei sitae rule: is there any room left for overriding mandatory provisions in the field of rights in rem? - III. The recovery of illegally transferred non-cultural objects. – IV. The enforcement of duties pertaining to the moveable assets in question. – V. Concluding remarks.",

keywords = "Diritti reali, Diritto internazionale privato, Private international law, Rights in rem, Diritti reali, Diritto internazionale privato, Private international law, Rights in rem",

author = "Pietro Franzina",

year = "2024",

doi = "10.37417/PILRIRUE/19",

language = "English",

isbn = "9788413818498",

pages = "469--476",

editor = "M. Font-Mas",

booktitle = "Private International Law on Rights in rem in the European Union. Derecho internacional privado sobre derechos reales en la Uni{\'o}n Europea",

}