Salta alla navigazione principale Salta alla ricerca Salta al contenuto principale

Validation of the Ontario Protocol Assessment Level (OPAL) Tool for Assessing Clinical Trial Complexity and Supporting Workforce Planning in the Italian Clinical Research Context

  • Daniele Napolitano*
  • , Mattia Bozzetti
  • , Rosario Caruso
  • , Monica Guberti
  • , Ileana Frau
  • , Bobbi Smuck
  • , Gionata Fiorino
  • , Franco Scaldaferri
  • , Lucrezia Laterza
  • , Antonio Gasbarrini
  • , Vincenzina Mora
  • *Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro
  • ASST di Cremona
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata
  • University of Milan
  • IRCCS Multimedica - Milano
  • IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli - Bologna
  • IQVIA Inc.
  • San Camillo Hospital

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo

Abstract

Introduction: The growing complexity of clinical trials, particularly in oncology, has significantly increased the operational burden on research staff. However, standardized and validated instruments to measure trial-related workload remain scarce. This study aimed to adapt and validate the Italian version of Ontario Protocol Assessment Level (I-OPAL) tool for the Italian context, providing a reliable framework for workload planning and feasibility assessment. Methods: A cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted across Italian research institutions. The OPAL tool was translated and culturally adapted following established validation procedures. Content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR), while inter-rater reliability was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Discriminant validity was examined through non-parametric tests, effect size measures, and multiple correspondence analysis. Results: A total of 513 clinical trials were included. The OPAL tool showed excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.93) and all items met the minimum CVR threshold (0.78–1.00). Significant differences in OPAL scores were observed across study type, clinical setting, sample size, and duration (all p < 0.001), with large effect sizes (ε2 up to 0.645). Higher OPAL scores were positively correlated with greater allocation of research staff, particularly nurses and data managers. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of findings, and internal consistency checks revealed full alignment with the model’s classification rules. Conclusions: The Italian validation of OPAL confirmed its reliability, validity, and practical relevance as a tool for standardized workload assessment in clinical research. Its integration into feasibility analyses and trial planning could enhance resource allocation, regulatory compliance, and sustainability of research activities in Italy.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)N/A-N/A
RivistaTherapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science
Numero di pubblicazioneN/A
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2026

OSS delle Nazioni Unite

Questo processo contribuisce al raggiungimento dei seguenti obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile

  1. SDG 3 - Salute e benessere
    SDG 3 Salute e benessere

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Farmacologia, Tossicologia e Farmaceutica (varie)
  • Salute Pubblica, Salute Ambientale e Occupazionale
  • Farmacologia (medica)

Keywords

  • Clinical research workforce
  • Clinical trial complexity
  • Feasibility analysis
  • Regulatory science
  • Trial operations
  • Workload assessment

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Validation of the Ontario Protocol Assessment Level (OPAL) Tool for Assessing Clinical Trial Complexity and Supporting Workforce Planning in the Italian Clinical Research Context'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo