TY - JOUR
T1 - Uterine displacement as fertility sparing technique for pelvic malignancies: Demonstration of the surgical options on a human cadaver
AU - Pavone, Matteo
AU - Lecointre, Lise
AU - Seeliger, Barbara
AU - Bizzarri, Nicolò
AU - Marescaux, Jacques
AU - Scambia, Giovanni
AU - Akladios, Cherif
AU - Querleu, Denis
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Preservation of fertility without compromising oncological outcomes is a major objective in young patients at the time of cancer treatment (Aza & iuml;s et al., 2018; Bizzarri et al., 2022). Radio(chemo)therapy is often required in pelvic malignancies (anus, rectum, sarcoma). Direct irradiation results in a damage to ovarian (Bizzarri et al., 2023) and endometrial function (Lohynska et al., 2021), compromising the fertility of female patients of reproductive age. While ovarian transposition is an established method to move the ovaries away from the radiation field (Morice et al., 2022; Pavone et al., 2023), corresponding surgical procedures displacing the uterus are investigational (Pavone et al., 2023; Querleu et al., 2010; Ribeiro et al., 2017, 2024). In a human female cadaver model, the reported laparoscopic techniques of uterine displacement were carried out to demonstrate their feasibility and the step-by-step surgical techniques. The surgeries were performed in a hybrid operating room which enables to perform CT-scan and evaluate the uterine positions according to anatomical landmarks. The following procedures were performed in the same cadaveric model and were described in the video: 1. Uterine suspension of the round ligaments to the abdominal wall 2. Uterine ventrofixation of the fundus at the level of the umbilical line 3. Uterine transposition according to the technique reported by Ribeiro et al. All procedures were completed without technical complications. All of these uterine displacement procedures are technically feasible. Uterine transposition is the most technically complex procedure, and its effectiveness in protecting the endometrium should be evaluated in comparison to the simpler techniques (Table 1). Future studies incorporating radiotherapy simulations are needed to define which technique represents the best compromise between surgical complexity and positioning the uterus at a level that receives the lowest possible radiation dose.
AB - Preservation of fertility without compromising oncological outcomes is a major objective in young patients at the time of cancer treatment (Aza & iuml;s et al., 2018; Bizzarri et al., 2022). Radio(chemo)therapy is often required in pelvic malignancies (anus, rectum, sarcoma). Direct irradiation results in a damage to ovarian (Bizzarri et al., 2023) and endometrial function (Lohynska et al., 2021), compromising the fertility of female patients of reproductive age. While ovarian transposition is an established method to move the ovaries away from the radiation field (Morice et al., 2022; Pavone et al., 2023), corresponding surgical procedures displacing the uterus are investigational (Pavone et al., 2023; Querleu et al., 2010; Ribeiro et al., 2017, 2024). In a human female cadaver model, the reported laparoscopic techniques of uterine displacement were carried out to demonstrate their feasibility and the step-by-step surgical techniques. The surgeries were performed in a hybrid operating room which enables to perform CT-scan and evaluate the uterine positions according to anatomical landmarks. The following procedures were performed in the same cadaveric model and were described in the video: 1. Uterine suspension of the round ligaments to the abdominal wall 2. Uterine ventrofixation of the fundus at the level of the umbilical line 3. Uterine transposition according to the technique reported by Ribeiro et al. All procedures were completed without technical complications. All of these uterine displacement procedures are technically feasible. Uterine transposition is the most technically complex procedure, and its effectiveness in protecting the endometrium should be evaluated in comparison to the simpler techniques (Table 1). Future studies incorporating radiotherapy simulations are needed to define which technique represents the best compromise between surgical complexity and positioning the uterus at a level that receives the lowest possible radiation dose.
KW - Pelvic cancer
KW - Radiotherapy
KW - Uterine ventrofixation
KW - Uterine suspension
KW - Uterine transposition
KW - Uterine displacement
KW - Pelvic cancer
KW - Radiotherapy
KW - Uterine ventrofixation
KW - Uterine suspension
KW - Uterine transposition
KW - Uterine displacement
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/292257
U2 - 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101436
DO - 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101436
M3 - Article
SN - 2211-338X
VL - 54
SP - N/A-N/A
JO - Gynecologic Oncology Reports
JF - Gynecologic Oncology Reports
ER -