TY - JOUR
T1 - Using HTA to lead decision on the use of adjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in Italy [Oral Presentation]
AU - De Waure, Chiara
AU - Bonanni, P
AU - Panatto, D
AU - Barbieri, M
AU - Poscia, Andrea
AU - Boccalini, S
AU - Capri, Stefano
AU - Di Pietro, Maria Luisa
AU - Specchia, Maria Lucia
AU - Gasparini, R
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Background
There are few Health Technology Assessment (HTA) reports
on influenza vaccination available in Italy, none of which
evaluated the adjuvanted trivalent inactivated vaccine (aTIV)
specifically developed to protect older adults (65 years). aTIV
has been used for a long time, but a current assessment is
worthwhile because of the availability of new influenza
vaccines and new data on the epidemiology of disease and
vaccine efficacy.
Methods
The HTA approach was used to analyze epidemiological,
clinical, economic, organizational and ethical aspects of aTIV
use in older adults. Alongside aTIV, three other influenza
vaccines are used to immunize older adults in Italy: standard
trivalent (TIV), intradermal (idTIV), and quadrivalent (QIV);
these were considered as comparators. To write the report, an
in-depth analysis of Italian surveillance data, and a comprehensive
literature review on the burden of disease and vaccine
effectiveness were carried out. Furthermore, a model was
developed to perform a cost-utility analysis, taking into
consideration Italian costs and setting the threshold for costeffectiveness
at E30,000/quality-adjusted life year.
Results
Analysis showed that the epidemiological and virological
features of influenza are highly age-dependent. Despite the
elderly having the lowest attack rate (on average 5%;
laboratory-confirmed diagnoses), the burden of disease in
older adults is disproportionately high. 74–95% of all flurelated
deaths occur among older adults, and 12.6% of elderly
individuals may develop influenza-related complications.
Compared to non-adjuvanted vaccines, aTIV has an acceptable
safety profile, is more immunogenic, and has higher effectiveness.
The cost-utility analysis showed that aTIV is highly costeffective
compared with TIV vaccines, and cost-saving
compared with idTIV and QIV.
Conclusions
This report – comprised of the most up to date data – reveals
that aTIV should be considered the vaccine of choice for older
adults.
Key messages:
Health Technology Assessment should be used to reassess
health technologies when new data become available or new
alternatives enter the market.
This Health Technology Assessment report on the adjuvanted
trivalent inactivated vaccine provides robust evidence
that the latter may be considered the vaccine of choice
in the elderly population.
AB - Background
There are few Health Technology Assessment (HTA) reports
on influenza vaccination available in Italy, none of which
evaluated the adjuvanted trivalent inactivated vaccine (aTIV)
specifically developed to protect older adults (65 years). aTIV
has been used for a long time, but a current assessment is
worthwhile because of the availability of new influenza
vaccines and new data on the epidemiology of disease and
vaccine efficacy.
Methods
The HTA approach was used to analyze epidemiological,
clinical, economic, organizational and ethical aspects of aTIV
use in older adults. Alongside aTIV, three other influenza
vaccines are used to immunize older adults in Italy: standard
trivalent (TIV), intradermal (idTIV), and quadrivalent (QIV);
these were considered as comparators. To write the report, an
in-depth analysis of Italian surveillance data, and a comprehensive
literature review on the burden of disease and vaccine
effectiveness were carried out. Furthermore, a model was
developed to perform a cost-utility analysis, taking into
consideration Italian costs and setting the threshold for costeffectiveness
at E30,000/quality-adjusted life year.
Results
Analysis showed that the epidemiological and virological
features of influenza are highly age-dependent. Despite the
elderly having the lowest attack rate (on average 5%;
laboratory-confirmed diagnoses), the burden of disease in
older adults is disproportionately high. 74–95% of all flurelated
deaths occur among older adults, and 12.6% of elderly
individuals may develop influenza-related complications.
Compared to non-adjuvanted vaccines, aTIV has an acceptable
safety profile, is more immunogenic, and has higher effectiveness.
The cost-utility analysis showed that aTIV is highly costeffective
compared with TIV vaccines, and cost-saving
compared with idTIV and QIV.
Conclusions
This report – comprised of the most up to date data – reveals
that aTIV should be considered the vaccine of choice for older
adults.
Key messages:
Health Technology Assessment should be used to reassess
health technologies when new data become available or new
alternatives enter the market.
This Health Technology Assessment report on the adjuvanted
trivalent inactivated vaccine provides robust evidence
that the latter may be considered the vaccine of choice
in the elderly population.
KW - Health Technology Assessment
KW - Influenza Vaccine
KW - Italy
KW - Health Technology Assessment
KW - Influenza Vaccine
KW - Italy
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/114666
M3 - Meeting Abstract
SN - 1101-1262
SP - 114
EP - 114
JO - European Journal of Public Health
JF - European Journal of Public Health
ER -