TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of multiple indicators to compare sustainability performance of organic vs conventional vineyard management
AU - Borsato, Eros
AU - Zucchinelli, Maria
AU - D'Ammaro, Daniele
AU - Giubilato, Elisa
AU - Zabeo, Alex
AU - Criscione, Paolo
AU - Pizzol, Lisa
AU - Cohen, Yafit
AU - Tarolli, Paolo
AU - Lamastra, Lucrezia
AU - Marinello, Francesco
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The wine sector is paying more attention to sustainable wine production practices, but this topic is highly debated because organic viticulture aims to a reduction of environmental impacts, while conventional viticulture ensures an increase of yield. This work provides an economic and environmental comparison using different indicators whereas no previous studies on viticulture have faced on both aspects of sustainability. Two distinct vineyards within the same case study farm were considered, where conventional and organic viticulture practices were applied for 5 years. For each type of production, we calculated the economic benefit and environmental indicators such as the Water Footprint, Carbon Footprint, and an indicator of environmental performance associated with the vineyard phase (“Vineyard Management” or “Vigneto” indicator part of the Italian VIVA certification framework). This latter considers six sub-indicators investigating pesticides management, fertilizers management, organic matter content, soil compaction, soil erosion, and landscape quality. The multi criteria approach is a novel framework assessing sustainability on vineyard management using environmental indicators from VIVA calculator and the economic aspect. Main results showed that organic management in viticulture can be applied without having economic losses and with the benefit of better preserving the natural capital.
AB - The wine sector is paying more attention to sustainable wine production practices, but this topic is highly debated because organic viticulture aims to a reduction of environmental impacts, while conventional viticulture ensures an increase of yield. This work provides an economic and environmental comparison using different indicators whereas no previous studies on viticulture have faced on both aspects of sustainability. Two distinct vineyards within the same case study farm were considered, where conventional and organic viticulture practices were applied for 5 years. For each type of production, we calculated the economic benefit and environmental indicators such as the Water Footprint, Carbon Footprint, and an indicator of environmental performance associated with the vineyard phase (“Vineyard Management” or “Vigneto” indicator part of the Italian VIVA certification framework). This latter considers six sub-indicators investigating pesticides management, fertilizers management, organic matter content, soil compaction, soil erosion, and landscape quality. The multi criteria approach is a novel framework assessing sustainability on vineyard management using environmental indicators from VIVA calculator and the economic aspect. Main results showed that organic management in viticulture can be applied without having economic losses and with the benefit of better preserving the natural capital.
KW - Informed decision-making
KW - LCA
KW - Sustainability
KW - VIVA
KW - Viticulture
KW - Water footprint
KW - Informed decision-making
KW - LCA
KW - Sustainability
KW - VIVA
KW - Viticulture
KW - Water footprint
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/144438
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076619358&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076619358&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135081
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135081
M3 - Article
SN - 0048-9697
VL - 711
SP - 135081-N/A
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
IS - 135081
ER -