Salta alla navigazione principale Salta alla ricerca Salta al contenuto principale

Updating the omeract filter: Implications of filter 2.0 to select outcome instruments through assessment of "truth": Content, face, and construct validity

  • P. Tugwell*
  • , M. Boers
  • , Maria Antonietta D'Agostino
  • , D. Beaton
  • , A. Boonen
  • , C. O. Bingham
  • , E. Choy
  • , P. G. Conaghan
  • , M. Dougados
  • , C. Duarte
  • , D. E. Furst
  • , F. Guillemin
  • , L. Gossec
  • , T. Heiberg
  • , Der Heijde D. M. Van
  • , S. Hewlett
  • , J. R. Kirwan
  • , T. K. Kvien
  • , R. B. Landewe
  • , P. J. Mease
  • M. Ostergaard, L. Simon, J. A. Singh, V. Strand, G. Wells
*Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro
  • University of Ottawa
  • Location VUmc
  • Université de Paris
  • Department of Occupational Sciences and Occupational Therapy, Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Coimbra
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Sorbonne Université
  • University of Oslo
  • Leiden University
  • University of Bristol
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo

Abstract

Objective: The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter provides guidelines for the development and validation of outcome measures for use in clinical research. The "Truth" section of the OMERACT Filter requires that criteria be met to demonstrate that the outcome instrument meets the criteria for content, face, and construct validity. Methods: Discussion groups critically reviewed a variety of ways in which case studies of current OMERACT Working Groups complied with the Truth component of the Filter and what issues remained to be resolved. Results: The case studies showed that there is broad agreement on criteria for meeting the Truth criteria through demonstration of content, face, and construct validity; however, several issues were identified that the Filter Working Group will need to address. Conclusion: These issues will require resolution to reach consensus on how Truth will be assessed for the proposed Filter 2.0 framework, for instruments to be endorsed by OMERACT. © 2014. All rights reserved.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)1000-1004
Numero di pagine5
RivistaTHE JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume41
Numero di pubblicazione5
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Reumatologia
  • Immunologia e Allergia
  • Immunologia

Keywords

  • Construct validity
  • Content validity
  • Face validity
  • Health Care
  • Humans
  • Omeract
  • Outcome and Process Assessment
  • Outcome and process assessment
  • Randomized controlled trials
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Rheumatic Diseases
  • Rheumatology
  • Truth Disclosure

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Updating the omeract filter: Implications of filter 2.0 to select outcome instruments through assessment of "truth": Content, face, and construct validity'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo