Updating the omeract filter: Discrimination and feasibility

Maria Antonietta D'Agostino, George Wells, Dorcas E. Beaton, Peter Tugwell, Maarten Boers, John R. Kirwan, Clifton O. Bingham, Annelies Boonen, Peter Brooks, Philip G. Conaghan, Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino, Maxime Dougados, Daniel E. Furst, Laure Gossec, Francis Guillemin, Philip Helliwell, Sarah Hewlett, Tore K. Kvien, Robert B. Landewé, Lyn MarchPhilip J. Mease, Mikkel Oøstergaard, Lee Simon, Jasvinder A. Singh, Vibeke Strand, Désirée M. Van Der Heijde

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

14 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

The " Discrimination" part of the OMERACT Filter asks whether a measure discriminates between situations that are of interest. " Feasibility" in the OMERACT Filter encompasses the practical considerations of using an instrument, including its ease of use, time to complete, monetary costs, and interpretability of the question(s) included in the instrument. Both the Discrimination and Reliability parts of the filter have been helpful but were agreed on primarily by consensus of OMERACT participants rather than through explicit evidence-based guidelines. In Filter 2.0 we wanted to improve this definition and provide specific guidance and advice to participants. © 2014. All rights reserved.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)1005-1010
Numero di pagine6
RivistaTHE JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume41
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2014

Keywords

  • Discrimination
  • Feasibility
  • Outcome And Process Assessment
  • Outcome Measures In Rheumatology
  • Discrimination, Psychological
  • Rheumatology
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Humans
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Rheumatic Diseases
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Updating the omeract filter: Discrimination and feasibility'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo