TY - JOUR
T1 - Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 17: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2022
AU - Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos
AU - Allende, Ana
AU - Alvarez-Ordóñez, Avelino
AU - Bolton, Declan
AU - Bover-Cid, Sara
AU - Chemaly, Marianne
AU - De Cesare, Alessandra
AU - Hilbert, Friederike
AU - Lindqvist, Roland
AU - Nauta, Maarten
AU - Peixe, Luísa
AU - Ru, Giuseppe
AU - Simmons, Marion
AU - Skandamis, Panagiotis
AU - Suffredini, Elisabetta
AU - Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
AU - Escámez, Pablo Salvador Fernández
AU - Maradona, Miguel Prieto
AU - Querol, Amparo
AU - Sijtsma, Lolke
AU - Suarez, Juan Evaristo
AU - Sundh, Ingvar
AU - Vlak, Just
AU - Barizzone, Fulvio
AU - Correia, Sandra
AU - Herman, Lieve
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach was developed to provide a regularly updated generic pre-evaluation of the safety of microorganisms, intended for use in the food or feed chains, to support the work of EFSA's Scientific Panels. The QPS approach is based on an assessment of published data for each agent, with respect to its taxonomic identity, the body of relevant knowledge and safety concerns. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit (TU) are, where possible, confirmed at the species/strain or product level and reflected by ‘qualifications’. In the period covered by this Statement, new information was found leading to the withdrawal of the qualification ‘absence of aminoglycoside production ability’ for Bacillus velezensis. The qualification for Bacillus paralicheniformis was changed to ‘absence of bacitracin production ability’. For the other TUs, no new information was found that would change the status of previously recommended QPS TUs. Of 52 microorganisms notified to EFSA between April and September 2022 (inclusive), 48 were not evaluated because: 7 were filamentous fungi, 3 were Enterococcus faecium, 2 were Escherichia coli, 1 was Streptomyces spp., and 35 were taxonomic units (TUs) that already have a QPS status. The other four TUs notified within this period, and one notified previously as a different species, which was recently reclassified, were evaluated for the first time for a possible QPS status: Xanthobacter spp. could not be assessed because it was not identified to the species level; Geobacillus thermodenitrificans is recommended for QPS status with the qualification ‘absence of toxigenic activity’. Streptoccus oralis is not recommended for QPS status. Ogataea polymorpha is proposed for QPS status with the qualification ‘for production purposes only’. Lactiplantibacillus argentoratensis (new species) is included in the QPS list.
AB - The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach was developed to provide a regularly updated generic pre-evaluation of the safety of microorganisms, intended for use in the food or feed chains, to support the work of EFSA's Scientific Panels. The QPS approach is based on an assessment of published data for each agent, with respect to its taxonomic identity, the body of relevant knowledge and safety concerns. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit (TU) are, where possible, confirmed at the species/strain or product level and reflected by ‘qualifications’. In the period covered by this Statement, new information was found leading to the withdrawal of the qualification ‘absence of aminoglycoside production ability’ for Bacillus velezensis. The qualification for Bacillus paralicheniformis was changed to ‘absence of bacitracin production ability’. For the other TUs, no new information was found that would change the status of previously recommended QPS TUs. Of 52 microorganisms notified to EFSA between April and September 2022 (inclusive), 48 were not evaluated because: 7 were filamentous fungi, 3 were Enterococcus faecium, 2 were Escherichia coli, 1 was Streptomyces spp., and 35 were taxonomic units (TUs) that already have a QPS status. The other four TUs notified within this period, and one notified previously as a different species, which was recently reclassified, were evaluated for the first time for a possible QPS status: Xanthobacter spp. could not be assessed because it was not identified to the species level; Geobacillus thermodenitrificans is recommended for QPS status with the qualification ‘absence of toxigenic activity’. Streptoccus oralis is not recommended for QPS status. Ogataea polymorpha is proposed for QPS status with the qualification ‘for production purposes only’. Lactiplantibacillus argentoratensis (new species) is included in the QPS list.
KW - Geobacillus thermodenitrificans
KW - Lactiplantibacillus argentoratensis
KW - Xanthobacter
KW - QPS
KW - Streptococcus oralis
KW - Ogataea polymorpha
KW - Geobacillus thermodenitrificans
KW - Lactiplantibacillus argentoratensis
KW - Xanthobacter
KW - QPS
KW - Streptococcus oralis
KW - Ogataea polymorpha
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/258724
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7746
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7746
M3 - Article
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 21
SP - N/A-N/A
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
ER -