TY - JOUR
T1 - Unmasking of presynaptic cutaneous HFOs burst by DBS lead recordings
AU - Insola, A
AU - Padua, Luca
AU - Mazzone, P
AU - Restuccia, Domenico
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - We have carefully read the article: exploring the physiology and function of high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) from the somatosensory cortex, by Ozaki and Hashimoto (2011).
Although we find this paper very interesting, we disagree with the method described to obtain HFOs due to pure cutaneous stimulation and we disagree with the conclusions on the consecutive presynaptic cortical burst reported as undetectable. In fact the index finger stimulation through a pair of ring electrodes attached at the proximal and distal interphalangeal joint elicited action potentials coming from both cutaneous and the Golgi tendon organs afferent fibers; accordingly, the HFOs are not of a pure cutaneous origin. In a previous report (Restuccia et al., 2002) we have described the detailed technique for selective electrical stimulation of muscle as well as cutaneous afferents able to evoke modality-specific responses in somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) recorded on the scalp of humans. To obtain pure cutaneous responses we have recorded SEPs after stimulation of the distal phalanx of the thumb, which selectively involve only cutaneous afferent. Our results are substantially in agreement with those of Ozaki and Hashimoto in which cutaneous inputs elicit larger cortical low frequency potentials compared to proprioceptive inputs (see Fig. 6 and Table 1 of Restuccia et al., 2002). Therefore we support the assertion that electrical median nerve stimulation at the wrist evokes sensory responses at the subcortical or primary somatosensory cortex that are attributed mainly to volleys of cutaneous afferents rather than those of muscle spindle afferents or tendon organ afferents.
AB - We have carefully read the article: exploring the physiology and function of high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) from the somatosensory cortex, by Ozaki and Hashimoto (2011).
Although we find this paper very interesting, we disagree with the method described to obtain HFOs due to pure cutaneous stimulation and we disagree with the conclusions on the consecutive presynaptic cortical burst reported as undetectable. In fact the index finger stimulation through a pair of ring electrodes attached at the proximal and distal interphalangeal joint elicited action potentials coming from both cutaneous and the Golgi tendon organs afferent fibers; accordingly, the HFOs are not of a pure cutaneous origin. In a previous report (Restuccia et al., 2002) we have described the detailed technique for selective electrical stimulation of muscle as well as cutaneous afferents able to evoke modality-specific responses in somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) recorded on the scalp of humans. To obtain pure cutaneous responses we have recorded SEPs after stimulation of the distal phalanx of the thumb, which selectively involve only cutaneous afferent. Our results are substantially in agreement with those of Ozaki and Hashimoto in which cutaneous inputs elicit larger cortical low frequency potentials compared to proprioceptive inputs (see Fig. 6 and Table 1 of Restuccia et al., 2002). Therefore we support the assertion that electrical median nerve stimulation at the wrist evokes sensory responses at the subcortical or primary somatosensory cortex that are attributed mainly to volleys of cutaneous afferents rather than those of muscle spindle afferents or tendon organ afferents.
KW - Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory
KW - Humans
KW - Somatosensory Cortex
KW - Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory
KW - Humans
KW - Somatosensory Cortex
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/42207
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.12.006
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.12.006
M3 - Article
VL - 123
SP - 842-842-4; author reply 842
JO - Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
JF - Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
ER -