Abstract
Paramagnetic oximeters are frequently used in clinical practice to measure and titrate
the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) administered to a hypoxic patient. Newborns are
prone to several diseases leading to hypoxia but also to oxidative damage, therefore a
precise measurement of administered oxygen is of paramount importance. In this study,
we evaluated and compared the performance of four commonly used gas analyzers at a
Neonatal Unit. A paramagnetic gas analyzer was considered the standard for reference.
Gas mixing performed by blenders was also evaluated. We first assessed the stability and
composition of O2 and medical air. A settling time study was conducted to estimate a
steady-state. Results show how tested blenders underestimated the real measures when
FiO2 was <50% and overestimated them when FiO2 50%. In all the tested oximeters
the FiO2 was underestimated by 1.18%, but the overall agreement with the gold standard
was very good.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | 1-6 |
Numero di pagine | 6 |
Rivista | Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification |
Volume | 6 |
DOI | |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2021 |
Pubblicato esternamente | Sì |
Keywords
- infant, newborn
- oximeter uncertainty
- oximetry
- oxygen.