Ultrasound as an outcome measure in gout. A validation process by the OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group

Maria Antonietta D'Agostino, Christian Dejaco, Lene Terslev, Marwin Gutierrez, Wolfgang A. Schmidt, Helen I. Keen, Emilio Filippucci, David Kane, Ralf Thiele, Gurjit Kaeley, Peter Balint, Peter Mandl, Andrea Delle Sedie, Hilde Berner Hammer, Robin Christensen, Ingrid Möller, Carlos Pineda, Eugene Kissin, George A. Bruyn, Annamaria IagnoccoEsperanza Naredo, Philippe Aegerter, Sibel Aydin, Marina Backhaus, David Bong, Isabelle Chary-Valckenaere, Paz Collado, Eugenio De Miguel, Oscar Epis, Jane E. Freeston, Frederique Gandjbakhch, Walter Grassi, Petra Hanova, Sandrine Jousse-Joulin, Fredrick Joshua, Juhani Koski, Damien Loeuille, Viviana Ravagnani, Anthony Reginato, Veronica Sharp, Nanno Swen, Marcin Szkudlarek, Richard J. Wakefield, Hans-Rudolf Ziswiler

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

30 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To summarize the work performed by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Ultrasound (US) Working Group on the validation of US as a potential outcome measure in gout. Methods. Based on the lack of definitions, highlighted in a recent literature review on US as an outcome tool in gout, a series of iterative exercises were carried out to obtain consensus-based definitions on US elementary components in gout using a Delphi exercise and subsequently testing these definitions in static images and in patients with proven gout. Cohen's κ was used to test agreement, and values of 0-0.20 were considered poor, 0.20-0.40 fair, 0.40-0.60 moderate, 0.60-0.80 good, and 0.80-1 excellent. Results. With an agreement of > 80%, consensus-based definitions were obtained for the 4 elementary lesions highlighted in the literature review: tophi, aggregates, erosions, and double contour (DC). In static images interobserver reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect, and similar results were found for the intrareader reliability. In patients the intraobserver agreement was good for all lesions except DC (moderate). The interobserver agreement was poor for aggregates and DC but moderate for the other components. Conclusion. These first steps in evaluating the validity of US as an outcome measure for gout show that the reliability of the definitions ranged from moderate to excellent in static images and somewhat lower in patients, indicating that a standardized scanning technique may be needed, before testing the responsiveness of those definitions in a composite US score.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)2177-2181
Numero di pagine5
RivistaTHE JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume42
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2015

Keywords

  • Consensus Development Conferences as Topic
  • Delphi Technique
  • Disease Progression
  • Female
  • France
  • Gout
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Reproducibility of results
  • Ultrasonography, Doppler
  • Ultrasound

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Ultrasound as an outcome measure in gout. A validation process by the OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo