TY - JOUR
T1 - Ultrasound as an outcome measure in gout. A validation process by the OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group
AU - Terslev, Lene
AU - Gutierrez, Marwin
AU - Schmidt, Wolfgang A.
AU - Keen, Helen I.
AU - Filippucci, Emilio
AU - Kane, David
AU - Thiele, Ralf
AU - Kaeley, Gurjit
AU - Balint, Peter
AU - Mandl, Peter
AU - Delle Sedie, Andrea
AU - Hammer, Hilde Berner
AU - Christensen, Robin
AU - Möller, Ingrid
AU - Pineda, Carlos
AU - Kissin, Eugene
AU - Bruyn, George A.
AU - Iagnocco, Annamaria
AU - Naredo, Esperanza
AU - D'Agostino, Maria Antonietta
AU - Aegerter, Philippe
AU - Aydin, Sibel
AU - Backhaus, Marina
AU - Bong, David
AU - Chary-Valckenaere, Isabelle
AU - Collado, Paz
AU - De Miguel, Eugenio
AU - Dejaco, Christian
AU - Epis, Oscar
AU - Freeston, Jane E.
AU - Gandjbakhch, Frederique
AU - Grassi, Walter
AU - Hanova, Petra
AU - Jousse-Joulin, Sandrine
AU - Joshua, Fredrick
AU - Koski, Juhani
AU - Loeuille, Damien
AU - Ravagnani, Viviana
AU - Reginato, Anthony
AU - Sharp, Veronica
AU - Swen, Nanno
AU - Szkudlarek, Marcin
AU - Wakefield, Richard J.
AU - Ziswiler, Hans-Rudolf
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Objective. To summarize the work performed by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Ultrasound (US) Working Group on the validation of US as a potential outcome measure in gout. Methods. Based on the lack of definitions, highlighted in a recent literature review on US as an outcome tool in gout, a series of iterative exercises were carried out to obtain consensus-based definitions on US elementary components in gout using a Delphi exercise and subsequently testing these definitions in static images and in patients with proven gout. Cohen's κ was used to test agreement, and values of 0-0.20 were considered poor, 0.20-0.40 fair, 0.40-0.60 moderate, 0.60-0.80 good, and 0.80-1 excellent. Results. With an agreement of > 80%, consensus-based definitions were obtained for the 4 elementary lesions highlighted in the literature review: tophi, aggregates, erosions, and double contour (DC). In static images interobserver reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect, and similar results were found for the intrareader reliability. In patients the intraobserver agreement was good for all lesions except DC (moderate). The interobserver agreement was poor for aggregates and DC but moderate for the other components. Conclusion. These first steps in evaluating the validity of US as an outcome measure for gout show that the reliability of the definitions ranged from moderate to excellent in static images and somewhat lower in patients, indicating that a standardized scanning technique may be needed, before testing the responsiveness of those definitions in a composite US score.
AB - Objective. To summarize the work performed by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Ultrasound (US) Working Group on the validation of US as a potential outcome measure in gout. Methods. Based on the lack of definitions, highlighted in a recent literature review on US as an outcome tool in gout, a series of iterative exercises were carried out to obtain consensus-based definitions on US elementary components in gout using a Delphi exercise and subsequently testing these definitions in static images and in patients with proven gout. Cohen's κ was used to test agreement, and values of 0-0.20 were considered poor, 0.20-0.40 fair, 0.40-0.60 moderate, 0.60-0.80 good, and 0.80-1 excellent. Results. With an agreement of > 80%, consensus-based definitions were obtained for the 4 elementary lesions highlighted in the literature review: tophi, aggregates, erosions, and double contour (DC). In static images interobserver reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect, and similar results were found for the intrareader reliability. In patients the intraobserver agreement was good for all lesions except DC (moderate). The interobserver agreement was poor for aggregates and DC but moderate for the other components. Conclusion. These first steps in evaluating the validity of US as an outcome measure for gout show that the reliability of the definitions ranged from moderate to excellent in static images and somewhat lower in patients, indicating that a standardized scanning technique may be needed, before testing the responsiveness of those definitions in a composite US score.
KW - Consensus Development Conferences as Topic
KW - Delphi Technique
KW - Disease Progression
KW - Female
KW - France
KW - Gout
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Outcome Assessment, Health Care
KW - Reproducibility of results
KW - Ultrasonography, Doppler
KW - Ultrasound
KW - Consensus Development Conferences as Topic
KW - Delphi Technique
KW - Disease Progression
KW - Female
KW - France
KW - Gout
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Outcome Assessment, Health Care
KW - Reproducibility of results
KW - Ultrasonography, Doppler
KW - Ultrasound
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/169076
U2 - 10.3899/jrheum.141294
DO - 10.3899/jrheum.141294
M3 - Article
SN - 0315-162X
VL - 42
SP - 2177
EP - 2181
JO - THE JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
JF - THE JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
ER -