TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC): Back to lauren’s classification in pan– cancer analysis era?
AU - Zurlo, I. V.
AU - Basso, M.
AU - Strippoli, A.
AU - Calegari, M. A.
AU - Orlandi, A.
AU - Cassano, Alessandra
AU - Di, Salvatore M.
AU - Garufi, G.
AU - Bria, Emilio
AU - Tortora, Giampaolo
AU - Barone, C.
AU - Pozzo, C.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background: Guidelines recommend a perioperative approach in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer, but in real-life many patients receive immediate surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT). Although histologic subtypes may have different response to CT, no study has explored the influence of histotype on the efficacy of perioperative CT (pCT) or aCT. Materials and methods: The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of clinicopathological features and histology (intestinal or diffuse) on survival according to strategy (pCT vs. aCT). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Results: Out of 203 patients affected by LAGC, 83 received pCT and 120 aCT. At multivariate, histology and LVI in pCT cohort and positive resection margin in the aCT influenced both OS and EFS. No difference in EFS and OS was observed in relation to strategy. However, in the intestinal-type of pCT cohort survival outcomes were significantly higher compared to the aCT cohort, whereas in the diffuse-type were significantly worse in patients receiving pCT compared to those receiving aCT. Conclusions: Although retrospective and small-sized, this study suggests that the benefit of pCT might be limited to the intestinal-type. This hypothesis needs to be confirmed in prospective series.
AB - Background: Guidelines recommend a perioperative approach in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer, but in real-life many patients receive immediate surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT). Although histologic subtypes may have different response to CT, no study has explored the influence of histotype on the efficacy of perioperative CT (pCT) or aCT. Materials and methods: The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of clinicopathological features and histology (intestinal or diffuse) on survival according to strategy (pCT vs. aCT). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Results: Out of 203 patients affected by LAGC, 83 received pCT and 120 aCT. At multivariate, histology and LVI in pCT cohort and positive resection margin in the aCT influenced both OS and EFS. No difference in EFS and OS was observed in relation to strategy. However, in the intestinal-type of pCT cohort survival outcomes were significantly higher compared to the aCT cohort, whereas in the diffuse-type were significantly worse in patients receiving pCT compared to those receiving aCT. Conclusions: Although retrospective and small-sized, this study suggests that the benefit of pCT might be limited to the intestinal-type. This hypothesis needs to be confirmed in prospective series.
KW - Adjuvant therapy
KW - Diffuse histology
KW - Gastric cancer
KW - Intestinal histology
KW - Neo-adjuvant therapy
KW - Perioperative therapy
KW - Adjuvant therapy
KW - Diffuse histology
KW - Gastric cancer
KW - Intestinal histology
KW - Neo-adjuvant therapy
KW - Perioperative therapy
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/314609
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087406762&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087406762&origin=inward
U2 - 10.3390/cancers12071749
DO - 10.3390/cancers12071749
M3 - Article
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 12
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 7
ER -