Salta alla navigazione principale Salta alla ricerca Salta al contenuto principale

Treatment and outcome of intracranial ependymoma after first relapse in the 2nd AIEOP protocol

  • M. Massimino*
  • , F. Barretta
  • , P. Modena
  • , P. Johann
  • , P. Ferroli
  • , M. Antonelli
  • , L. Gandola
  • , M. L. Garre
  • , D. Bertin
  • , Angela Mastronuzzi
  • , M. Mascarin
  • , L. Quaglietta
  • , E. Viscardi
  • , I. Sardi
  • , Antonio Ruggiero
  • , L. Boschetti
  • , M. Giagnacovo
  • , V. Biassoni
  • , E. Schiavello
  • , L. Chiapparini
  • A. Erbetta, A. Mussano, C. Giussani, R. M. Mura, S. Barra, G. Scarzello, G. Scimone, A. Carai, F. Giangaspero, F. R. Buttarelli
*Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro
  • IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Anna di Como
  • German Cancer Research Center
  • IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta - Milano
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • Azienda Ospedaliera - Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
  • IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico - Aviano PN
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Santobono Pausillipon
  • University of Padua
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Meyer
  • University of Milan - Bicocca
  • San Martino Hospital Genoa
  • IRCCS Istituto Oncologico Veneto - Padova
  • IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed - Pozzilli (IS)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D’Aragona
  • IRCCS Ospedale pediatrico Bambino Gesù - Roma

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivista › Articolo

Abstract

Background: More than 40% of patients with intracranial ependymoma need a salvage treatment within 5 years after diagnosis, and no standard treatment is available as yet. We report the outcome after first relapse of 64 patients treated within the 2nd AIEOP protocol. Methods: We considered relapse sites and treatments, that is, various combinations of complete/incomplete surgery, if followed by standard or hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) ± chemotherapy (CT). Molecular analyses were available for 38/64 samples obtained at first diagnosis. Of the 64 cases, 55 were suitable for subsequent analyses. Results: The median follow-up was 147 months after diagnosis, 84 months after first relapse, 5-year EFS/OS were 26.2%/30.8% (median EFS/OS 13/32 months) after relapse. For patients with a local relapse (LR), the 5-year cumulative incidence of second LRs was 51.6%, with a 5-year event-specific probability of being LR-free of 40.0%. Tumor site/grade, need for shunting, age above/below 3 years, molecular subgroup at diagnosis, had no influence on outcomes. Due to variation in the RT dose/fractionation used and the subgroup sizes, it was not possible to assess the impact of the different RT modalities. Multivariable analyses identified completion of surgery, the absence of symptoms at relapse, and female sex as prognostically favorable. Tumors with a 1q gain carried a higher cumulative incidence of dissemination after first relapse. Conclusions: Survival after recurrence was significantly influenced by symptoms and completeness of surgery. Only a homogeneous protocol with well-posed, randomized questions could clarify the numerous issues, orient salvage treatment, and ameliorate prognosis for this group of patients.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)467-479
Numero di pagine13
RivistaNeuro-Oncology
Volume24
Numero di pubblicazione3
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncologia
  • Neurologia (clinica)
  • Ricerca sul Cancro

Keywords

  • 1q gain
  • complete surgery
  • dissemination
  • ependymoma relapse
  • re-irradiation

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Treatment and outcome of intracranial ependymoma after first relapse in the 2nd AIEOP protocol'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo