TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment and outcome of intracranial ependymoma after first relapse in the 2nd AIEOP protocol
AU - Massimino, Maura
AU - Barretta, Francesco
AU - Modena, Piergiorgio
AU - Johann, Pascal
AU - Ferroli, Paolo
AU - Antonelli, Manila
AU - Gandola, Lorenza
AU - Garrè, Maria Luisa
AU - Bertin, Daniele
AU - Mastronuzzi, Angela
AU - Mascarin, Maurizio
AU - Quaglietta, Lucia
AU - Viscardi, Elisabetta
AU - Sardi, Iacopo
AU - Ruggiero, Antonio
AU - Boschetti, Luna
AU - Giagnacovo, Marzia
AU - Biassoni, Veronica
AU - Schiavello, Elisabetta
AU - Chiapparini, Luisa
AU - Erbetta, Alessandra
AU - Mussano, Anna
AU - Giussani, Carlo
AU - Mura, Rosa Maria
AU - Barra, Salvina
AU - Scarzello, Giovanni
AU - Scimone, Giuseppe
AU - Carai, Andrea
AU - Giangaspero, Felice
AU - Buttarelli, Francesca Romana
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: More than 40% of patients with intracranial ependymoma need a salvage treatment within 5 years after diagnosis, and no standard treatment is available as yet. We report the outcome after first relapse of 64 patients treated within the 2nd AIEOP protocol. Methods: We considered relapse sites and treatments, that is, various combinations of complete/incomplete surgery, if followed by standard or hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) ± chemotherapy (CT). Molecular analyses were available for 38/64 samples obtained at first diagnosis. Of the 64 cases, 55 were suitable for subsequent analyses. Results: The median follow-up was 147 months after diagnosis, 84 months after first relapse, 5-year EFS/OS were 26.2%/30.8% (median EFS/OS 13/32 months) after relapse. For patients with a local relapse (LR), the 5-year cumulative incidence of second LRs was 51.6%, with a 5-year event-specific probability of being LR-free of 40.0%. Tumor site/grade, need for shunting, age above/below 3 years, molecular subgroup at diagnosis, had no influence on outcomes. Due to variation in the RT dose/fractionation used and the subgroup sizes, it was not possible to assess the impact of the different RT modalities. Multivariable analyses identified completion of surgery, the absence of symptoms at relapse, and female sex as prognostically favorable. Tumors with a 1q gain carried a higher cumulative incidence of dissemination after first relapse. Conclusions: Survival after recurrence was significantly influenced by symptoms and completeness of surgery. Only a homogeneous protocol with well-posed, randomized questions could clarify the numerous issues, orient salvage treatment, and ameliorate prognosis for this group of patients.
AB - Background: More than 40% of patients with intracranial ependymoma need a salvage treatment within 5 years after diagnosis, and no standard treatment is available as yet. We report the outcome after first relapse of 64 patients treated within the 2nd AIEOP protocol. Methods: We considered relapse sites and treatments, that is, various combinations of complete/incomplete surgery, if followed by standard or hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) ± chemotherapy (CT). Molecular analyses were available for 38/64 samples obtained at first diagnosis. Of the 64 cases, 55 were suitable for subsequent analyses. Results: The median follow-up was 147 months after diagnosis, 84 months after first relapse, 5-year EFS/OS were 26.2%/30.8% (median EFS/OS 13/32 months) after relapse. For patients with a local relapse (LR), the 5-year cumulative incidence of second LRs was 51.6%, with a 5-year event-specific probability of being LR-free of 40.0%. Tumor site/grade, need for shunting, age above/below 3 years, molecular subgroup at diagnosis, had no influence on outcomes. Due to variation in the RT dose/fractionation used and the subgroup sizes, it was not possible to assess the impact of the different RT modalities. Multivariable analyses identified completion of surgery, the absence of symptoms at relapse, and female sex as prognostically favorable. Tumors with a 1q gain carried a higher cumulative incidence of dissemination after first relapse. Conclusions: Survival after recurrence was significantly influenced by symptoms and completeness of surgery. Only a homogeneous protocol with well-posed, randomized questions could clarify the numerous issues, orient salvage treatment, and ameliorate prognosis for this group of patients.
KW - 1q gain
KW - complete surgery
KW - dissemination
KW - ependymoma relapse
KW - re-irradiation
KW - 1q gain
KW - complete surgery
KW - dissemination
KW - ependymoma relapse
KW - re-irradiation
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/223518
U2 - 10.1093/neuonc/noab230
DO - 10.1093/neuonc/noab230
M3 - Article
SN - 1522-8517
VL - 24
SP - 467
EP - 479
JO - Neuro-Oncology
JF - Neuro-Oncology
ER -