The article critically examines the content of three legal decisions (Courts of Florence, Catania and Milan) which ask the Constitutional Court to invalidate the prohibition of heterologous artificial fertilization in the Italian law on medically assisted procreation (Law n. 40 from 2004). The controversial ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of S.H. vs. Austria decided April 1, 2010 is also examined in passing as it influenced the decisions of the Italian judges. After interventions with the intention of introducing pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, now the attempt is to introduce a planned and agreed upon dissociation of parenthood. The rights of the conceived child are thus facing a new, difficult trial.
|Titolo tradotto del contributo||[Autom. eng. transl.] Three Italian Courts, the European Court of Human Rights and the right of conceived to the unity of parental figures. Pending the decision of the Constitutional Court on the ban on heterologous fertilization|
|Numero di pagine||29|
|Rivista||Medicina e Morale|
|Stato di pubblicazione||Pubblicato - 2011|
- fecondazione eterologa