TY - JOUR
T1 - Trade sanctions and Global Value Chains: A China–South Africa perspective
AU - Bruno, Randolph Luca
AU - Cipollina, Maria
AU - Dal Bianco, Silvia
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - China has been an important trade partner for many African countries, and in particular for
South Africa, whose trade volume with China has increased significantly over the past decades.
Changes of global trade and Global Value Chains (GVCs) dynamics as response of increasing
trade sanctions bring substantial economic challenges for both countries directly involved and
countries not directly involved by sanctions. On the one hand, trade sanctions have direct
effects on sanctioned countries. On the other, sanctions can have significant indirect effects on
countries not involved, as a consequence of trade diversion, changes in comparative advantages,
and geopolitical realignment. The paper provides an empirical assessment of Global Value
Chains’ re-organization by China and African countries in the age of trade sanctions. It explores
and quantifies the intertwined relationship between trade sanctions, GVCs participation, and
Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA), with a focus on the dyad China–South Africa in a
comparative perspective vis-á-vis other Chinese trade partners. The analysis is based on a
purpose-built dataset covering GVCs participation indexes on 66 origin and destination countries
for 68 industries (ISIC Rev.4) over the period 2005–2018. A simplified evolutionary model
shows how the indirect effect of sanctions on forward GVCs could be positive and sizable, the
mechanism being the displacement of (heterogeneous) inefficient firms with (heterogeneous)
more efficient ones; while the indirect effect of sanctions on backward GVCs is indeterminate. By
zooming onto the China–South Africa relations, the paper sheds new light on the consequences
of sanctions, as perceived from both buyer’s (backward) and seller’s (forward) perspective, in
a so-called South–South trade partnership.
AB - China has been an important trade partner for many African countries, and in particular for
South Africa, whose trade volume with China has increased significantly over the past decades.
Changes of global trade and Global Value Chains (GVCs) dynamics as response of increasing
trade sanctions bring substantial economic challenges for both countries directly involved and
countries not directly involved by sanctions. On the one hand, trade sanctions have direct
effects on sanctioned countries. On the other, sanctions can have significant indirect effects on
countries not involved, as a consequence of trade diversion, changes in comparative advantages,
and geopolitical realignment. The paper provides an empirical assessment of Global Value
Chains’ re-organization by China and African countries in the age of trade sanctions. It explores
and quantifies the intertwined relationship between trade sanctions, GVCs participation, and
Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA), with a focus on the dyad China–South Africa in a
comparative perspective vis-á-vis other Chinese trade partners. The analysis is based on a
purpose-built dataset covering GVCs participation indexes on 66 origin and destination countries
for 68 industries (ISIC Rev.4) over the period 2005–2018. A simplified evolutionary model
shows how the indirect effect of sanctions on forward GVCs could be positive and sizable, the
mechanism being the displacement of (heterogeneous) inefficient firms with (heterogeneous)
more efficient ones; while the indirect effect of sanctions on backward GVCs is indeterminate. By
zooming onto the China–South Africa relations, the paper sheds new light on the consequences
of sanctions, as perceived from both buyer’s (backward) and seller’s (forward) perspective, in
a so-called South–South trade partnership.
KW - Trade Sanctions
KW - Global Value Chains
KW - South-Africa
KW - Gravity Model
KW - China
KW - Revealed Comparative Advantage
KW - Trade Sanctions
KW - Global Value Chains
KW - South-Africa
KW - Gravity Model
KW - China
KW - Revealed Comparative Advantage
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/299777
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102300
U2 - 10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102300
DO - 10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102300
M3 - Article
SN - 1043-951X
VL - 89
SP - 1
EP - 17
JO - China Economic Review
JF - China Economic Review
ER -