Abstract
In the entrenched technoscientific and social developments and orders that\r\nhave characterized the technological developments in the past decades, the\r\nregulatory approaches adopted to think of them, set their pace and stabilize\r\nthem in different countries have been refined and revised over time. Especially\r\nthe European Union (EU) provides an excellent research site to study regulatory\r\nchanges. The growth and integration of the EU parallels the attempts\r\nto regulate fields like biotechnology, nanotechnology and synthetic biology.\r\nFor that reason it offers an excellent opportunity to study how “ethics” has\r\nbeen developed and mobilized as part of the co-production of science and\r\nsocial order (Jasanoff 2005, 2012).
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| Titolo della pubblicazione ospite | Science and Democracy. Making Knowledge and Making Power in the Biosciences and Beyond, |
| Editore | Routledge |
| Pagine | 156-175 |
| Numero di pagine | 20 |
| ISBN (stampa) | 978-0-415-82134-6 |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2015 |
Keywords
- European ethics
- Soft law
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'To Bind or Not to Bind? European Ethics as Dolft law'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver