Time to surgery and pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancer: A population study on 2094 patients

Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Simona Di Giambenedetto, Vincenzo Valentini, Carlotta Masciocchi, Giuditta Chiloiro, Andrea Bacigalupo, Giovanna Mantello, Maika Di Benedetto, Marco Lupattelli, Elisa Palazzari, Liliana Belgioia, Almalina Bacigalupo, Aldo Sainato, Sabrina Montrone, Lucia Turri, Angela Caroli, Antonino De Paoli, Fabio Matrone, Carlo Capirci, Giampaolo MontesiRita Marina Niespolo, Mattia Falchetto Osti, Luciana Caravatta, Alessandra Galardi, Domenico Genovesi, Maria Elena Rosetto, Caterina Boso, Piera Sciacero, Lucia Giaccherini, Salvatore Parisi, Antonella Fontana, Francesco Romeo Filippone, Alessio Giuseppe Morganti

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

25 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Background To retrospectively evaluate the difference in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR) according to time elapsed between chemoradiation (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME) on a large unselected real-life dataset of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. Methods A multicentre retrospective cohort study of LARC patients from 21 Italian Radiotherapy Institutions was performed. Patients were stratified into 3 different time intervals from CRT. The 1st group included 300 patients who underwent TME within 6 weeks, the 2nd 1598 patients (TME within 7–12 weeks) and the 3rd 196 patients (TME within 13 or more weeks after CRT), respectively. Results Data on 2094 LARC patients treated between 1997 and 2016 were considered suitable for analysis. Overall, 578 patients had stage II while 1516 had stage III histological proven invasive rectal adenocarcinoma. A CRT schedule of one agent (N = 1585) or 2-drugs (N = 509) was administered. Overall, pCR was 22.3% (N = 468 patients). The proportion of patients achieving pCR with respect to time interval was, as follows: 12.6% (1st group), 23% (2nd group) and 31.1% (3rd group) (p < 0.001), respectively. The pCR relative risk comparison of 2nd to 1st group was 1.8, while 3rd to 2nd group was 1.3. Moreover, between the 3rd and 1st group, a pCR relative risk of 2.4 (p < 0.01) was noted. At univariate analysis, clinical stage III (p < 0.001), radiotherapy dose >5040 cGy (p = 0.002) and longer interval (p < 0.001) were significantly correlated to pCR. The positive impact of interval (p < 0.001) was confirmed at multivariate analysis as the only correlated factor. Conclusion We confirmed on a population-level that lengthening the interval (>13 weeks) from CRT to surgery improves the pathological response (pCR and pathologic partial response; pPR) in comparison to historic data. Furthermore, radiotherapy dose >5040 cGy and two drugs chemotherapy correlated with pPR rate.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)8-14
Numero di pagine7
RivistaClinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Volume4
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2017

Keywords

  • Chemoradiation
  • Rectal cancer
  • Surgery
  • TME
  • Time interval

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Time to surgery and pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancer: A population study on 2094 patients'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo