Abstract
This paper aims to examine how parents use the argument from authority and its effectiveness to persuade their children to accept rules and prescriptions during mealtimes. Using the model of a critical discussion integrated with the Argumentum Model of Topics as analytical approach, a corpus of 31 arguments from authority advanced by parents were analyzed. The results of this study show that parents always refer to an adult as source of authority. This is mostly themselves (self-oriented argument), and, less frequently, a third party (other-oriented argument) such as a grandparent or a child's teacher. In light of these results, it is reasonable to assume that for the parents the reference to themselves is a more effective argument than the reference to a third party. However, in the corpus the children are more prone to accept their parents' argumentation when the authority is another adult and not one of their parents.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 133-157 |
| Numero di pagine | 25 |
| Rivista | Journal of Argumentation in Context |
| Volume | 4 |
| Numero di pubblicazione | 2 |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2015 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Comunicazione
- Lingua e Linguistica
- Linguistica e Lingue
Keywords
- Argumentum Model of Topics
- authority
- family
- mealtime
- model of a critical discussion
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di '“This is the cheese bought by Grandpa”: A study of the arguments from authority used by parents with their children during mealtime conversations'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver