TY - JOUR
T1 - The Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS)
AU - Sorgente, Angela
AU - Iannello, Nicolò M.
AU - Musso, Pasquale
AU - Inguglia, Cristiano
AU - Lanz, Margherita
AU - Antonietti, Alessandro
AU - Villani, Daniela
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The current study proposed the adaptation of the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS) to the religious\r\ndomain as an instrument to measure both individuals’ religious identity formation processes (when a variable-centered approach is adopted)\r\nand religious identity statuses (when a person-centered approach is adopted). The scale has been tested on a sample of 727 Italian\r\nparticipants aged 13–65 years, by collecting evidence of score structure, convergent, and criterion-related validity. Regarding the score\r\nstructure validity, we confirmed that religious identity formation consists of three processes (commitment, in-depth exploration,\r\nreconsideration of commitment) and that, by using these scores, individuals can be placed into five different religious identity clusters\r\n(achievement, diffusion, foreclosure, moratorium, searching moratorium). As to the convergent and criterion-related validity, we tested the\r\nrelationship that the three factors (religious identity formation processes) and the five clusters (religious identity statuses) have with\r\nreligiousness and subjective well-being, respectively. Results indicate that the instrument is a promising tool to measure religious identity.\r\nFuture studies should test this scale in other countries and with people from diverse religious traditions.
AB - The current study proposed the adaptation of the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS) to the religious\r\ndomain as an instrument to measure both individuals’ religious identity formation processes (when a variable-centered approach is adopted)\r\nand religious identity statuses (when a person-centered approach is adopted). The scale has been tested on a sample of 727 Italian\r\nparticipants aged 13–65 years, by collecting evidence of score structure, convergent, and criterion-related validity. Regarding the score\r\nstructure validity, we confirmed that religious identity formation consists of three processes (commitment, in-depth exploration,\r\nreconsideration of commitment) and that, by using these scores, individuals can be placed into five different religious identity clusters\r\n(achievement, diffusion, foreclosure, moratorium, searching moratorium). As to the convergent and criterion-related validity, we tested the\r\nrelationship that the three factors (religious identity formation processes) and the five clusters (religious identity statuses) have with\r\nreligiousness and subjective well-being, respectively. Results indicate that the instrument is a promising tool to measure religious identity.\r\nFuture studies should test this scale in other countries and with people from diverse religious traditions.
KW - Religion
KW - Religion
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/314664
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85111127361&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85111127361&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000665
DO - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000665
M3 - Article
SN - 1015-5759
VL - 38
SP - 176
EP - 186
JO - European Journal of Psychological Assessment
JF - European Journal of Psychological Assessment
IS - 3
ER -