Abstract
The standard of the patient’s best interests is the main bioethical standard used in the decision-making process that involves incompetent patients (i.e. neonatology, pediatric patients and incompetent adults). This standard has been widely criticized as being self-destructive, individualistic, vague, unknown, dangerous and open to abuse. With the purpose of defending it, several reforms of this standard have been proposed, especially in the pediatric field. We propose a redefinition of the standard based on two concepts: 1) medical futility as a negative criterion, and 2) the principle of proportionality as a positive criterion. Our work includes a new relationship between concepts in classical moral theology (i.e. ordinary / extraordinary; proportionate / disproportionate) applied to the bioethics of life-sustaining treatments for incompetent patients.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 19-42 |
| Numero di pagine | 24 |
| Rivista | CUADERNOS DE BIOÉTICA |
| Volume | 31 |
| Numero di pubblicazione | 101 |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2020 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Medicina Generale
Keywords
- The best interests standard
- extraordinary
- futility
- life-sustaining treatments.
- ordinary
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'The therapeutic proportionality standard: a new content for the best interests standard.'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver