TY - JOUR
T1 - The Self-Regulation of Learning – Self-Report Scale for Sport Practice: Validation of an Italian Version for Football
AU - Reverberi, Eleonora
AU - Gozzoli, Caterina
AU - D'Angelo, Chiara
AU - Lanz, Margherita
AU - Sorgente, Angela
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Self-regulation of learning (SRL) is a key psychological factor that supports young athletes aiming to reach the elite level by promoting their involvement in deliberate practice. We contributed to the validation of the Italian version of the Bartulovic et al. (2017) Self-Regulation of Learning – Self-Report Scale for Sport Practice by testing its factorial structure, reliability, and measurement invariance among elite and non-elite football players, involving 415 male professional, semi-professional, and amateur youth academy players (Mage = 16.2, SD = 1.51). The original six-factor structure (planning, reflection, effort, self-efficacy, self-monitoring, and evaluation) did not fit the data well and a five-factor solution (where self-monitoring and evaluation items load on the same factor, named “self-supervision”) was a better fit. This five-factor solution was measurement invariant across groups of elite and non-elite athletes. We found that elite athletes scored significantly higher than non-elite ones in each SRL subprocess. Implications for future validation studies and for the use of this tool are discussed.
AB - Self-regulation of learning (SRL) is a key psychological factor that supports young athletes aiming to reach the elite level by promoting their involvement in deliberate practice. We contributed to the validation of the Italian version of the Bartulovic et al. (2017) Self-Regulation of Learning – Self-Report Scale for Sport Practice by testing its factorial structure, reliability, and measurement invariance among elite and non-elite football players, involving 415 male professional, semi-professional, and amateur youth academy players (Mage = 16.2, SD = 1.51). The original six-factor structure (planning, reflection, effort, self-efficacy, self-monitoring, and evaluation) did not fit the data well and a five-factor solution (where self-monitoring and evaluation items load on the same factor, named “self-supervision”) was a better fit. This five-factor solution was measurement invariant across groups of elite and non-elite athletes. We found that elite athletes scored significantly higher than non-elite ones in each SRL subprocess. Implications for future validation studies and for the use of this tool are discussed.
KW - football
KW - measurement invariance
KW - self-regulation of learning
KW - validation
KW - young athletes
KW - football
KW - measurement invariance
KW - self-regulation of learning
KW - validation
KW - young athletes
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/176643
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604852
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604852
M3 - Article
SN - 1664-1078
SP - 604852
EP - 604852
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
ER -