The 'open-artery hypothesis': New clinical and pathophysiologic insights

Carlo Trani, Antonio Abbate, Arnaldo Baldinetti, Alfonso Baldi, George W. Vetrovec

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

21 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

The open-artery hypothesis states that myocardial reperfusion, even if late for myocardial salvage, provides benefits and prevents adverse cardiac remodeling. While observational data in humans regarding the deleterious impact of a permanent infarct-related artery occlusion and the benefits of spontaneous reperfusion are quite consistent, the reports regarding late revascularization are inconclusive in order to prove such a hypothesis. The observational studies tend to have selection biases, while randomized trials to date are too small to be conclusive. Moreover, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying presumed benefits of reperfusion are still unclear. However, although the open-artery hypothesis remains unproven, the current evidence suggesting benefits calls for additional studies. Limitations of ischemic left ventricular dilatation and myopathy could markedly reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Copyright © 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)196-206
Numero di pagine11
RivistaCardiology
Volume100
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2003

Keywords

  • Animals
  • Apoptosis
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Ischemia
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Myocardial Reperfusion Injury
  • Myocardial Revascularization
  • Remodelling
  • Reperfusion
  • Revascularization
  • Survival Rate
  • Ventricular Function, Left
  • Ventricular Remodeling

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'The 'open-artery hypothesis': New clinical and pathophysiologic insights'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo