Abstract
The author argues that, for any chosen level of the public debt, a consequent social burden arises as the tax-percentage of GNP that can be imposed to service the debt. In this way, there is an infinite number of steady-state paths that are sustainable (and each of them might well be different from one country to another).
When considering Europe, the trouble is that the particular Maastricht couple of 3% Deficit/GNP and 60% Debt/GNP was chosen as a singularity, simply because at the time, those parameters characterized the German Economy.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 103-116 |
| Numero di pagine | 14 |
| Rivista | Cambridge Journal of Economics |
| Volume | 1998 |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 1998 |
Keywords
- Public debt sustainability
- Situation of main EU countries at the end of 1996
- total indebtedness
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'The myth ( or folly ) of the 3% deficit/GDP Maastricht ‘parameter’'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver