TY - JOUR
T1 - The MITO CERV-2 trial: A randomized phase II study of cetuximab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel, in advanced or recurrent cervical cancer
AU - Pignata, Sandro
AU - Scambia, Giovanni
AU - Lorusso, Domenica
AU - De Giorgi, Ugo
AU - Nicoletto, Maria Ornella
AU - Lauria, Rossella
AU - Mosconi, Anna Maria
AU - Sacco, Cosimo
AU - Omarini, Claudia
AU - Tagliaferri, Pierosandro
AU - Ferrandina, Maria Gabriella
AU - Cinieri, Saverio
AU - Savarese, Antonella
AU - Valabrega, Giorgio
AU - Pisano, Carmela
AU - Salutari, Vanda
AU - Raspagliesi, Francesco
AU - Kopf, Barbara
AU - Cecere, Sabrina Chiara
AU - Amadio, Giulia
AU - Maltese, Giuseppa
AU - Di Napoli, Marilena
AU - Greggi, Stefano
AU - Signoriello, Simona
AU - Daniele, Gennaro
AU - Sacco, Alessandra
AU - Losito, Simona
AU - Normanno, Nicola
AU - Perrone, Francesco
AU - Gallo, Ciro
AU - Piccirillo, Maria Carmela
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - BACKGROUND:
Cervical cancer cells often express Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR). Cetuximab (CET), an anti-EGFR antibody, can be safely combined with carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P), a standard treatment for advanced/recurrent cervical cancer (ARCC) patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
ARCC patients, ECOG PS ≤ 1, were randomized to CP for 6 cycles with or without CET (400 mg/m2 one week before starting CP, then 250 mg/m2 weekly) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Event-free survival (EFS) was the primary endpoint. With a 4.5 months expected median EFS and a 6.4 months predicted EFS (HR 0.70), 0.20 one-tailed α and 80% power, 89 events were required for the final intent-to-treat analysis.
RESULTS:
108 patients were assigned to CP (n = 53) or CP-CET (n = 55). Median age was 50, 69% were PS0, 76% had recurrent disease, 91% had distant metastasis and 57% had received previous chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 23 months, 102 patients had an event, 97 progressed and 61 died. Median EFS was 4.7 and 6.0 months (one-tail P = 0.43), median PFS was 5.2 and 7.6 months (one-tail P = 0.20) and median OS was 17.7 and 17 months (one-tail P = 0.27), with CP and CP-CET, respectively. There was no difference in the occurrence of severe adverse events, except for skin toxicity. Biomarker analysis, in a small subgroup of patients, suggests that PIK3CA mutation might be predictive of CET resistance.
CONCLUSION:
CP-CET was not more active than CP alone in unselected ARCC patient
AB - BACKGROUND:
Cervical cancer cells often express Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR). Cetuximab (CET), an anti-EGFR antibody, can be safely combined with carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P), a standard treatment for advanced/recurrent cervical cancer (ARCC) patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
ARCC patients, ECOG PS ≤ 1, were randomized to CP for 6 cycles with or without CET (400 mg/m2 one week before starting CP, then 250 mg/m2 weekly) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Event-free survival (EFS) was the primary endpoint. With a 4.5 months expected median EFS and a 6.4 months predicted EFS (HR 0.70), 0.20 one-tailed α and 80% power, 89 events were required for the final intent-to-treat analysis.
RESULTS:
108 patients were assigned to CP (n = 53) or CP-CET (n = 55). Median age was 50, 69% were PS0, 76% had recurrent disease, 91% had distant metastasis and 57% had received previous chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 23 months, 102 patients had an event, 97 progressed and 61 died. Median EFS was 4.7 and 6.0 months (one-tail P = 0.43), median PFS was 5.2 and 7.6 months (one-tail P = 0.20) and median OS was 17.7 and 17 months (one-tail P = 0.27), with CP and CP-CET, respectively. There was no difference in the occurrence of severe adverse events, except for skin toxicity. Biomarker analysis, in a small subgroup of patients, suggests that PIK3CA mutation might be predictive of CET resistance.
CONCLUSION:
CP-CET was not more active than CP alone in unselected ARCC patient
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - Cetuximab
KW - PIK3CA mutation
KW - Randomized phase 2
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - Cetuximab
KW - PIK3CA mutation
KW - Randomized phase 2
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/134893
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.260
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.260
M3 - Article
SN - 0090-8258
SP - N/A-N/A
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
ER -