TY - JOUR
T1 - The interobserver agreement between expert ultrasound operators when differentiating between adnexal tumors using ultrasound pattern recognition
AU - Yazbek, J
AU - Holland, Tk
AU - Van Holsbeke, C
AU - Testa, Antonia Carla
AU - Valentin, L
AU - Jurkovic, D
AU - Timmerman, D.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Objectives: To assess interobserver agreement and diagnostic
accuracy of expert ultrasound operators using pattern recognition
to assess the nature of adnexal masses.
Methods: Static B-mode preoperative ultrasound images containing
gray-scale and color Doppler information of a selected mix
of difficult adnexal masses of 166 patients were examined
independently by three expert ultrasound operators (A, B and C).
They all had access to relevant clinical information, but none of
the experts performed the original real-time scans. The experts were
asked to classify tumors as benign or malignant and to subclassify
tumors into one of 11 histological subgroups. The diagnostic
performance of each expert was compared with the histological
diagnosis of the respective specimen. Each operator s diagnoses were
compared with the other two operators diagnoses using Cohen s
kappa coefficient.
Results: There were 36 invasive malignancies, 34 borderline ovarian
tumors (BOT) and 96 benign tumors. The sensitivity and specificity
with regard to malignancy (BOT and invasive) were: 86% (95% CI,
75 93) and 91% (95% CI, 83 96) for Expert A, 86% (95% CI,
75 93) and 80% (95% CI, 70 87) for Expert B, and 80% (95%
CI, 68 89) and 85% (95% CI, 77 92) for Expert C. There was
a good interobserver agreement when diagnosing ovarian tumors
as benign, BOT and invasive (kappa = 0.69, 95% CI, 0.59 0.79
comparing Experts A and B; kappa = 0.71, 95% CI, 0.62 0.82,
comparing Experts A and C; and kappa = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.66 0.84,
comparing Experts B and C) and when predicting the histological
subtypes (kappa = 0.63, 95% CI, 0.55 0.71, comparing Experts A
and B; kappa = 0.67, 95% CI, 0.59 0.75, comparing Experts A
and C; and kappa = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.58 0.76, comparing Experts
B and C).
Conclusions: Expert ultrasound operators have a good level of
agreement when differentiating between difficult ovarian tumors
using the ultrasound pattern recognition method. This shows that
the high accuracy of this method is reproducible.
AB - Objectives: To assess interobserver agreement and diagnostic
accuracy of expert ultrasound operators using pattern recognition
to assess the nature of adnexal masses.
Methods: Static B-mode preoperative ultrasound images containing
gray-scale and color Doppler information of a selected mix
of difficult adnexal masses of 166 patients were examined
independently by three expert ultrasound operators (A, B and C).
They all had access to relevant clinical information, but none of
the experts performed the original real-time scans. The experts were
asked to classify tumors as benign or malignant and to subclassify
tumors into one of 11 histological subgroups. The diagnostic
performance of each expert was compared with the histological
diagnosis of the respective specimen. Each operator s diagnoses were
compared with the other two operators diagnoses using Cohen s
kappa coefficient.
Results: There were 36 invasive malignancies, 34 borderline ovarian
tumors (BOT) and 96 benign tumors. The sensitivity and specificity
with regard to malignancy (BOT and invasive) were: 86% (95% CI,
75 93) and 91% (95% CI, 83 96) for Expert A, 86% (95% CI,
75 93) and 80% (95% CI, 70 87) for Expert B, and 80% (95%
CI, 68 89) and 85% (95% CI, 77 92) for Expert C. There was
a good interobserver agreement when diagnosing ovarian tumors
as benign, BOT and invasive (kappa = 0.69, 95% CI, 0.59 0.79
comparing Experts A and B; kappa = 0.71, 95% CI, 0.62 0.82,
comparing Experts A and C; and kappa = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.66 0.84,
comparing Experts B and C) and when predicting the histological
subtypes (kappa = 0.63, 95% CI, 0.55 0.71, comparing Experts A
and B; kappa = 0.67, 95% CI, 0.59 0.75, comparing Experts A
and C; and kappa = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.58 0.76, comparing Experts
B and C).
Conclusions: Expert ultrasound operators have a good level of
agreement when differentiating between difficult ovarian tumors
using the ultrasound pattern recognition method. This shows that
the high accuracy of this method is reproducible.
KW - The interobserver difference
KW - ultrasound pattern recognition
KW - The interobserver difference
KW - ultrasound pattern recognition
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/35876
M3 - Conference article
SN - 0960-7692
SP - 429
EP - 429
JO - ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
JF - ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
T2 - 17th World Congress on Ultrasound
in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Y2 - 7 October 2007 through 11 October 2007
ER -