TY - JOUR
T1 - The Influence of Eugenic Thinking on Special Needs Assessment Procedures. A Historical and International-Comparative Study of Germany, Italy, and the United States
AU - Debe', Anna
AU - Erşan, Ö.
AU - Neuhaus, T.
AU - Polenghi, Simonetta
AU - Viteri Paredes, M. J.
AU - Vogt, M.
AU - Waitoller, F. R.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The eugenics ideology had a global impact, leaving its mark on every country it touched. One area it influenced was the educational sector, particularly in the process of identifying students as ‘educable’ or ‘not educable,’ especially those with cognitive impairments or learning disabilities. Our research focused on investigating the influence of eugenics on assessment procedures in three countries: Germany, Italy, and the United States. The first part of our study examined the development of these assessment procedures and how they changed before and after the eugenics movement in each country. The second part aimed to compare the results from each country and identify similarities and differences. Our findings revealed that while there may be a common overarching narrative regarding the key elements, institutions, and individuals involved\r\nin these identification procedures, the underlying reality is more complex. Each country’s unique history and circumstances significantly impact their position within this narrative. Our research raises questions about whether there can be a universal approach to these assessment procedures.
AB - The eugenics ideology had a global impact, leaving its mark on every country it touched. One area it influenced was the educational sector, particularly in the process of identifying students as ‘educable’ or ‘not educable,’ especially those with cognitive impairments or learning disabilities. Our research focused on investigating the influence of eugenics on assessment procedures in three countries: Germany, Italy, and the United States. The first part of our study examined the development of these assessment procedures and how they changed before and after the eugenics movement in each country. The second part aimed to compare the results from each country and identify similarities and differences. Our findings revealed that while there may be a common overarching narrative regarding the key elements, institutions, and individuals involved\r\nin these identification procedures, the underlying reality is more complex. Each country’s unique history and circumstances significantly impact their position within this narrative. Our research raises questions about whether there can be a universal approach to these assessment procedures.
KW - Eugenic Thinking
KW - Germany
KW - History of Education
KW - Italy
KW - Special Needs Assessment Procedures
KW - United States
KW - Eugenic Thinking
KW - Germany
KW - History of Education
KW - Italy
KW - Special Needs Assessment Procedures
KW - United States
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/307197
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105008104532&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105008104532&origin=inward
U2 - 10.14516/ete.11202
DO - 10.14516/ete.11202
M3 - Article
SN - 2340-7263
VL - 11
SP - 24
EP - 47
JO - ESPACIO, TIEMPO Y EDUCACIÓN
JF - ESPACIO, TIEMPO Y EDUCACIÓN
IS - 2
ER -