THE ECTHR GRAND CHAMBER’S JUDGMENT IN THE NAI¨TLIMAN CASE: AN UNNECESSARY CLARIFICATION OF THE REACH OF FORUM NECESSITATIS JURISDICTION?

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

The Grand Chamber judgment in the Naı¨t-Liman v. Switzerland case is certainly a much anticipated one. Its outcome had, however, long been foreshadowed by commentators and practitioners alike. The decision confirmed the 2016 Chamber’s judgment by holding that the Swiss Federal Tribunal’s decline of jurisdiction in a civil case involving reparation for torture committed outside the territory of Switzerland by foreign authorities against a foreign national did not amount to a violation of Article 6(1) ECHR. However, the Court’s reasoning in the case under review is susceptible of being criticized in more than one respect. The compatibility of the conduct of the Swiss judiciary with Article 6(1) ECHR is dubious to say the least, even more so since the Federal Tribunal’s restrictive interpretation of the requirements for the application of forum necessitatis jurisdiction, and especially of the “sufficient connection” requirement, managed to produce a fully-fledged denial of justice. Should such a trend gain consistency, the effectiveness of the right of access to a court may be put at risk.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)349-382
Numero di pagine34
RivistaRIVISTA DI DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE PRIVATO E PROCESSUALE
Volume55
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2019

Keywords

  • forum necessitatis

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'THE ECTHR GRAND CHAMBER’S JUDGMENT IN THE NAI¨TLIMAN CASE: AN UNNECESSARY CLARIFICATION OF THE REACH OF FORUM NECESSITATIS JURISDICTION?'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo