TY - JOUR
T1 - The doctor-patient relationship in general practice. How quality of communication, trust, and epistemological beliefs about medicine affect satisfaction after medical consultation. 17th Biennial European Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making Leiden, the Netherlands, June 10-12, 2018
AU - Petrocchi, Serena
AU - Iannello, Paola
AU - Lecciso, Flavia
AU - Antonietti, Alessandro
AU - Schulz, Peter
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Purpose: analyze: generalized (GR) and dyadic reciprocity (DR) of quality of communication\r\nand trust in doctor-patient relations; the associations among patients’ quality of communication,\r\ntrust, epistemological beliefs and satisfaction.\r\nMethod(s): Participants were 11 GPs (Mage = 54.16, SD = 12.28, 7 men) and their 149 patients\r\n(Mage = 47.48, SD = 9.88, 62.4% women; doctor-patients range 1-30, M = 14, SD = 9.3). After a\r\nconsultation, doctors and patients independently completed questionnaires on quality of\r\ncommunication (Campbell et al., 2007) and trust (Dugan et al., 2005). Patients completed a\r\nquestionnaire on their epistemological beliefs about medicine (Kienhues & Bromme, 2012) and\r\nsatisfaction.\r\nResult(s): MLM modelling provided estimation of reciprocity (quality of communication: BGR =\r\n.17, SE = .07, Z = 2.31*, BDR = -.78, SE = .15, Z = -5.25***; trust: BGR = .15, SE = .05, Z =\r\n2.51*, BDR = -.65, SE = .12, Z = -4.27***). Hierarchical regression analysis [F(7 141) = 41.32, p\r\n< .0001, R2adj. = .66, Step 2] showed that doctor’s years of experience, t = -2.11*, B = -.11,\r\nquality of communication skills, t = 2.32*, B = .16, and trust, t = 9.55***, B = .68, were\r\nassociated with patients’ satisfaction after the visit (controlling for patients’ age, gender, general\r\nhealth, and number of visits). Test of simple mediation yielded significant effects of: a) stability\r\nof epistemological beliefs on patients’ trust in doctor, b = .38* (SE = .16); b) patients’ trust in\r\ndoctor on satisfaction, b = .62*** (SE = .09). Indirect effect of stability of beliefs on satisfaction\r\ndid not reach the significance.\r\nConclusion(s): Estimation of the generalized reciprocity showed that a physician who perceives\r\nhigh quality of relation/trust tends to have patients who perceive high quality of relation too. As\r\ndyadic reciprocity, if a physician perceives high quality of relation/trust with a particular patient\r\n(more than with other patients), that patient perceives low quality of relation with that physician\r\n(more than the physician’s other patients). Regression and mediation analyses suggested that the\r\npatients’ evaluation of quality of communi
AB - Purpose: analyze: generalized (GR) and dyadic reciprocity (DR) of quality of communication\r\nand trust in doctor-patient relations; the associations among patients’ quality of communication,\r\ntrust, epistemological beliefs and satisfaction.\r\nMethod(s): Participants were 11 GPs (Mage = 54.16, SD = 12.28, 7 men) and their 149 patients\r\n(Mage = 47.48, SD = 9.88, 62.4% women; doctor-patients range 1-30, M = 14, SD = 9.3). After a\r\nconsultation, doctors and patients independently completed questionnaires on quality of\r\ncommunication (Campbell et al., 2007) and trust (Dugan et al., 2005). Patients completed a\r\nquestionnaire on their epistemological beliefs about medicine (Kienhues & Bromme, 2012) and\r\nsatisfaction.\r\nResult(s): MLM modelling provided estimation of reciprocity (quality of communication: BGR =\r\n.17, SE = .07, Z = 2.31*, BDR = -.78, SE = .15, Z = -5.25***; trust: BGR = .15, SE = .05, Z =\r\n2.51*, BDR = -.65, SE = .12, Z = -4.27***). Hierarchical regression analysis [F(7 141) = 41.32, p\r\n< .0001, R2adj. = .66, Step 2] showed that doctor’s years of experience, t = -2.11*, B = -.11,\r\nquality of communication skills, t = 2.32*, B = .16, and trust, t = 9.55***, B = .68, were\r\nassociated with patients’ satisfaction after the visit (controlling for patients’ age, gender, general\r\nhealth, and number of visits). Test of simple mediation yielded significant effects of: a) stability\r\nof epistemological beliefs on patients’ trust in doctor, b = .38* (SE = .16); b) patients’ trust in\r\ndoctor on satisfaction, b = .62*** (SE = .09). Indirect effect of stability of beliefs on satisfaction\r\ndid not reach the significance.\r\nConclusion(s): Estimation of the generalized reciprocity showed that a physician who perceives\r\nhigh quality of relation/trust tends to have patients who perceive high quality of relation too. As\r\ndyadic reciprocity, if a physician perceives high quality of relation/trust with a particular patient\r\n(more than with other patients), that patient perceives low quality of relation with that physician\r\n(more than the physician’s other patients). Regression and mediation analyses suggested that the\r\npatients’ evaluation of quality of communi
KW - doctor-patient relationship
KW - trust
KW - doctor-patient relationship
KW - trust
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/130828
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061589650&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061589650&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1177/0272989X18793413
DO - 10.1177/0272989X18793413
M3 - Conference article
SN - 0272-989X
VL - 38
SP - E505-E505
JO - Medical Decision Making
JF - Medical Decision Making
IS - 6
ER -