Salta alla navigazione principale Salta alla ricerca Salta al contenuto principale

A national mandatory-split liver policy: A report from the Italian experience

  • Roberta Angelico
  • , Silvia Trapani
  • , Marco Spada*
  • , Michele Colledan
  • , Jean de Ville de Goyet
  • , Mauro Salizzoni
  • , Luciano De Carlis
  • , Enzo Andorno
  • , Salvatore Gruttadauria
  • , Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
  • , Matteo Cescon
  • , Giorgio Rossi
  • , Andrea Risaliti
  • , Giuseppe Tisone
  • , Umberto Tedeschi
  • , Marco Vivarelli
  • , Salvatore Agnes
  • , Paolo De Simone
  • , Luigi Giovanni Lupo
  • , Fabrizio Di Benedetto
  • Walter Santaniello, Fausto Zamboni, Vincenzo Mazzaferro, Massimo Rossi, Francesca Puoti, Stefania Camagni, Chiara Grimaldi, Enrico Gringeri, Lucia Rizzato, Alessandro Nanni Costa, Umberto Cillo
*Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro
  • IRCCS Ospedale pediatrico Bambino Gesù - Roma
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanita
  • ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII
  • IRCCS Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (ISMETT) - Palermo
  • University of Turin
  • University of Milan - Bicocca
  • San Martino Hospital Genoa
  • San Camillo Hospital
  • University of Bologna
  • University of Milan
  • University of Udine
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata
  • Hospital Verona
  • Marche Polytechnic University
  • University Hospital of Pisa
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale Antonio Cardarelli
  • General and Hepatic Transplantation Surgery Unit
  • IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • University of Padua

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo

Abstract

To implement split liver transplantation (SLT) a mandatory-split policy has been adopted in Italy since August 2015: donors aged 18-50 years at standard risk are offered for SLT, resulting in a left-lateral segment (LLS) graft for children and an extended-right graft (ERG) for adults. We aim to analyze the impact of the new mandatory-split policy on liver transplantation (LT)-waiting list and SLT outcomes, compared to old allocation policy. Between August 2015 and December 2016 out of 413 potentially “splittable” donors, 252 (61%) were proposed for SLT, of whom 53 (21%) donors were accepted for SLT whereas 101 (40.1%) were excluded because of donor characteristics and 98 (38.9%) for absence of suitable pediatric recipients. The SLT rate augmented from 6% to 8.4%. Children undergoing SLT increased from 49.3% to 65.8% (P =.009) and the pediatric LT-waiting list time dropped (229 [10-2121] vs 80 [12-2503] days [P =.045]). The pediatric (4.5% vs 2.5% [P =.398]) and adult (9.7% to 5.2% [P <.001]) LT-waiting list mortality reduced; SLT outcomes remained stable. Retransplantation (HR = 2.641, P =.035) and recipient weight >20 kg (HR = 5.113, P =.048) in LLS, and ischemic time >8 hours (HR = 2.475, P =.048) in ERG were identified as predictors of graft failure. A national mandatory-split policy maximizes the SLT donor resources, whose selection criteria can be safely expanded, providing favorable impact on the pediatric LT-waiting list and priority for adult sick LT candidates.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)2029-2043
RivistaAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Volume19
Numero di pubblicazione7
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Immunologia e Allergia
  • Trapianto
  • Farmacologia (medica)

Keywords

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Transplantation
  • clinical research/practice
  • donors and donation
  • health services and outcomes research
  • liver transplantation/hepatology
  • liver transplantation: split
  • organ allocation
  • organ procurement and allocation
  • pediatrics
  • waitlist management

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'A national mandatory-split liver policy: A report from the Italian experience'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo