Abstract
The current debate on possible objects entails several problems. We focused on the issue of
possible objects reality and sided for the possibilist position. As a matter of fact, we believe
this position to be the best suited to classical metaphysical tradition. The classical possibilism
we defend herein, though, has a realist foundation that is essentially different from Lewis’ concretist
possibilism. It construes possible objects as possible non-existing objects of an existing
producing power. Consequently, they are nothing vis-à-vis the modality of actual being of their
own, though they are existing with regard to the modality of being of the producing power. The
actualist requirement prescribed by the Frege-Quinean criterion of the quantification domain is
thus fulfilled, therefore possible objects must not necessarily be actual objects. Hence the sense
of coincidence between classical possibilism and actualist possibilism.
Titolo tradotto del contributo | [Autom. eng. transl.] CLASSIC THEORY OF THE POSSIBLE. CLASSICAL POSSIBILISM AND ITS CURRENT FOUNDATION |
---|---|
Lingua originale | Italian |
pagine (da-a) | 3-27 |
Numero di pagine | 25 |
Rivista | RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEOSCOLASTICA |
Volume | 2016 |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2016 |
Pubblicato esternamente | Sì |
Keywords
- Actualism/Possibilism
- Actuality
- Actus essendi
- Attualità
- Ens Necessarium
- Essence
- Essenza
- Logica modale quantificata
- Mondi possibili
- Plantinga's Theory of Modality
- Possibility
- Possibilità
- Possible worlds semantics
- Quantified Modal Logic
- Semantica modale
- Williamson's Theory of Modality
- Zalta's Theory of Modality