Swinging malpractice. Il pendolo della responsabilità medica

Carlo Castronovo

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review


Medical malpractice has become in Italy a field of controversy between Courts and Legislature after the latter adopted a couple of statutes, in 2012 and 2017. Both of them in particular diverge from the consolidated approach of the judicature as to the nature of liability of surgeons and medical operators whose activity is carried out inside medical institutions as hospitals and clinics. Contrary to the judicial precedents of last twenty years, which affirmed the contractual nature of liability of these professionals, the statutory provisions qualify this one as tortious in order to alleviate the burden of damages arising from malpractice and contrast the so called defensive medicine. Liability concerning hospitals though keeps on being contractual. The consequence is a double regime generating problems of coordination, particularly in case of reimbursement requested by medical institutions to their operators whose malpractice is at the origin of liability towards the patients. In turn this subject has been complicated by a strange position of the Corte di Cassazione, which under the species of causation has exhumed the already buried distinction between obligations de moyen and obligations de résultat.
Titolo tradotto del contributo[Autom. eng. transl.] Swinging malpractice. The pendulum of medical responsibility
Lingua originaleItalian
pagine (da-a)847-900
Numero di pagine54
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2020


  • Liability concerning hospitals
  • causalità
  • causation
  • contractual liability
  • medical liability
  • natura della responsabilità
  • responsabilità del medico
  • responsabilità della struttura sanitaria


Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Swinging malpractice. Il pendolo della responsabilità medica'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo