Strategic Thinking and the IMP Approach: a Comparative Analysis

Annalisa Tunisini, Enrico Baraldi, Ross Brennan, Debbie Harrison, Judy Zolkiewski

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

62 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

The paper compares the IMP approach with five important schools of thought in strategy, with the aims of establishing what areas of agreement and disagreement exist and identifying whether the IMP approach can yield unique insights into strategy, strategizing, and the strategy process. Authors compare and contrast the IMP approach with, in turn, the rational planning approach to strategy associated with Ansoff, the positioning approach associated with Porter, the resource-based view associated with Barney, the deliberate/emergent approach associated with Mintzberg, and the strategy-as-practice approach associated with Whittington. The outcome from the analysis is a suggested research agenda designed to bring the concepts and methods of industrial network research to bear upon strategy, strategizing, and the strategy process.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)879-895
Numero di pagine17
RivistaIndustrial Marketing Management
Volume36
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2007

Keywords

  • COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
  • EMERGENT STRATEGY
  • NETWORK STRATEGY

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Strategic Thinking and the IMP Approach: a Comparative Analysis'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo