Stepwise provisional versus systematic culotte for stenting of true coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised EBC TWO Trial

Sandeep Arunothayaraj, Miles W. Behan, Thierry Lefèvre, Jens F. Lassen, Alaide Chieffo, Goran Stankovic, Francesco Burzotta, Manuel Pan, Miroslaw Ferenc, Thomas Hovasse, Mark S. Spence, Philippe Brunel, James M. Cotton, James Cockburn, Didier Carrié, Andreas Baumbach, Michael Maeng, Yves Louvard, David Hildick-Smith

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

Abstract

Background: The multicentre European Bifurcation Club Trial (EBC TWO) showed no significant differences in 12-month clinical outcomes between patients randomised to a provisional stenting strategy or systematic culotte stenting in non-left main true bifurcations. Aims: This study aimed to investigate the 5-year clinical results of the EBC TWO Trial. Methods: A total of 200 patients undergoing stent implantation for non-left main bifurcation lesions were recruited into EBC TWO. Inclusion criteria required a side branch diameter ≥2.5 mm and side branch lesion length >5 mm. Five-year follow-up was completed for 197 patients. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation. Results: The mean side branch stent diameter was 2.7±0.3 mm and mean side branch lesion length was 10.3±7.2 mm. At 5-year follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 18.4% of provisional and 23.7% of systematic culotte patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-1.38). No significant differences were identified individually for all-cause mortality (7.8% vs 7.2%, HR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.40-3.05), myocardial infarction (8.7% vs 13.4%, HR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.27-1.50) or target vessel revascularisation (6.8% vs 9.3%, HR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.37-3.34). Stent thrombosis rates were also similar (1.9% vs 3.1%, HR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.11-3.75). There was no significant interaction between the extent of side branch disease and the primary outcome (p=0.34). Conclusions: In large non-left main true bifurcation lesions, the use of a systematic culotte strategy showed no benefit over provisional stenting for the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation at 5 years. The stepwise provisional approach may be considered preferable for the majority of true coronary bifurcation lesions.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)N/A-N/A
RivistaEuroIntervention
Volume4
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2023

Keywords

  • ACS/NSTE-ACS
  • bifurcation
  • drug-eluting stent
  • stable angina

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Stepwise provisional versus systematic culotte for stenting of true coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised EBC TWO Trial'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo