TY - UNPB
T1 - Sprechi e medicina difensiva
AU - Damiani, Gianfranco
AU - Specchia, Maria Lucia
AU - Ferriero, Anna Maria
AU - Capizzi, Silvio
AU - Di Gregorio, Vincenzo
AU - Ricciardi, Walter
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Defensive medicine has recently escalated as a problem of progressively increasing magnitude and concern.\r\nTargeted studies report that a high percentage of health professionals in Italy prescribe drugs in excess, request blood tests\r\nand radiological investigations, refer patients to specialist services or admit them to the hospital explicitly for the purpose of\r\naverting malpractice suits. For the same reason, high-risk cases, perceived as dangerous from a legal point of view, are often\r\navoided by the professionals and do not receive adequate care. Such a behavior decreases the quality of healthcare also exposing\r\npatients to significant risks of harm and generates a highly negative economic impact, with a waste estimated around\r\n10 billion euros per year, more than 10% of the whole Italian healthcare cost.\r\nThe practice of defensive medicine can be associated with the rising number of medical malpractice lawsuits, which is\r\nconsequence of several contributing factors, particularly the increased risks in healthcare, the impact of social and cultural\r\nchanges and some facilitating aspects of the legal system. Various solutions have been adopted internationally with the aim\r\nof reducing defensive medical acts. The use of mediation to favour dispute settlements out of the court of law and the adoption\r\nof no-fault systems have turned out to be the most effective approaches.\r\nIn Italy, the first attempt to face the issue of defensive medicine has been the “Balduzzi law”, which intended to limit the uncontrolled\r\nexpansion of the field of liability. Although many obstacles against its implementation have limited the efficacy of\r\nthe law by itself, it has with no doubt nourished the parliamentary debate so that ten new laws have been proposed in a oneyear\r\ninterval. The suggested fields of intervention ranged from preventive measures of medical malpractice, to optimization\r\nin management of adverse events, to redefinition of disciplinary and legal consequences. Unfortunately, none of the proposed\r\nlaws were issued. The present paper analyzes the phenomenon of defensive medicine, looking at its causes, its consequences\r\nand its epidemiologic and economic burden. After reviewing the various international approaches to the problem, it describes\r\nthe current Italian law and the details of the new laws proposed by the Parliament, aiming at highlighting the main\r\nobstacles towards their implementation, in order to give a useful starting point for concrete actions to minimize the use of\r\ndefensive medicine and its associated economic wastes.
AB - Defensive medicine has recently escalated as a problem of progressively increasing magnitude and concern.\r\nTargeted studies report that a high percentage of health professionals in Italy prescribe drugs in excess, request blood tests\r\nand radiological investigations, refer patients to specialist services or admit them to the hospital explicitly for the purpose of\r\naverting malpractice suits. For the same reason, high-risk cases, perceived as dangerous from a legal point of view, are often\r\navoided by the professionals and do not receive adequate care. Such a behavior decreases the quality of healthcare also exposing\r\npatients to significant risks of harm and generates a highly negative economic impact, with a waste estimated around\r\n10 billion euros per year, more than 10% of the whole Italian healthcare cost.\r\nThe practice of defensive medicine can be associated with the rising number of medical malpractice lawsuits, which is\r\nconsequence of several contributing factors, particularly the increased risks in healthcare, the impact of social and cultural\r\nchanges and some facilitating aspects of the legal system. Various solutions have been adopted internationally with the aim\r\nof reducing defensive medical acts. The use of mediation to favour dispute settlements out of the court of law and the adoption\r\nof no-fault systems have turned out to be the most effective approaches.\r\nIn Italy, the first attempt to face the issue of defensive medicine has been the “Balduzzi law”, which intended to limit the uncontrolled\r\nexpansion of the field of liability. Although many obstacles against its implementation have limited the efficacy of\r\nthe law by itself, it has with no doubt nourished the parliamentary debate so that ten new laws have been proposed in a oneyear\r\ninterval. The suggested fields of intervention ranged from preventive measures of medical malpractice, to optimization\r\nin management of adverse events, to redefinition of disciplinary and legal consequences. Unfortunately, none of the proposed\r\nlaws were issued. The present paper analyzes the phenomenon of defensive medicine, looking at its causes, its consequences\r\nand its epidemiologic and economic burden. After reviewing the various international approaches to the problem, it describes\r\nthe current Italian law and the details of the new laws proposed by the Parliament, aiming at highlighting the main\r\nobstacles towards their implementation, in order to give a useful starting point for concrete actions to minimize the use of\r\ndefensive medicine and its associated economic wastes.
KW - Defensive medicine
KW - Waste
KW - Defensive medicine
KW - Waste
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/71015
M3 - Documento di lavoro
SP - 8
EP - 27
BT - Sprechi e medicina difensiva
ER -