TY - JOUR
T1 - Spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis
AU - Leone, Antonio
AU - Marino, Marzia
AU - Dell'Atti, Claudia
AU - Zecchi, Viola
AU - Magarelli, Nicola
AU - Colosimo, Cesare
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The ankylosed spine is prone to fracture even after minor trauma due to its changed biomechanical properties. The two central features of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) that promote the pathological remodeling of the spine are inflammation and new bone formation. AS is also associated with osteoporosis that is attributed to an uncoupling of the bone formation and bone resorption processes. Therefore, bone resorption occurs and promotes weakening of the spine as well as increased risk of vertebral fractures which can be hugely different in terms of clinical relevance. Even in the presence of symptomatic clinical vertebral fractures, the diagnosis can be overruled by attributing the pain to disease activity. Furthermore, given the highly abnormal structure of the spine, vertebral fracture diagnosis can be difficult on the basis of radiography alone. CT can show the fractures in detail. Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the method of choice for the imaging of spinal cord injuries, and a reasonable option for exclusion of occult fractures undetected by CT. Since it is equally important for radiologists and clinicians to have a common knowledge base rather than a compartmentalized view, the aim of this review article was to provide the required clinical knowledge that radiologists need to know and the relevant radiological semiotics that clinicians require in diagnosing clinically significant injury to the ankylosed spine.
AB - The ankylosed spine is prone to fracture even after minor trauma due to its changed biomechanical properties. The two central features of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) that promote the pathological remodeling of the spine are inflammation and new bone formation. AS is also associated with osteoporosis that is attributed to an uncoupling of the bone formation and bone resorption processes. Therefore, bone resorption occurs and promotes weakening of the spine as well as increased risk of vertebral fractures which can be hugely different in terms of clinical relevance. Even in the presence of symptomatic clinical vertebral fractures, the diagnosis can be overruled by attributing the pain to disease activity. Furthermore, given the highly abnormal structure of the spine, vertebral fracture diagnosis can be difficult on the basis of radiography alone. CT can show the fractures in detail. Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the method of choice for the imaging of spinal cord injuries, and a reasonable option for exclusion of occult fractures undetected by CT. Since it is equally important for radiologists and clinicians to have a common knowledge base rather than a compartmentalized view, the aim of this review article was to provide the required clinical knowledge that radiologists need to know and the relevant radiological semiotics that clinicians require in diagnosing clinically significant injury to the ankylosed spine.
KW - Ankylosing spondylitis
KW - Ankylosing spondylitis, CT
KW - Ankylosing spondylitis, magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Ankylosing spondylitis, radiography
KW - Ankylosing spondylitis, vertebral fractures
KW - Ankylosing spondylitis
KW - Ankylosing spondylitis, CT
KW - Ankylosing spondylitis, magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Ankylosing spondylitis, radiography
KW - Ankylosing spondylitis, vertebral fractures
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/93321
U2 - 10.1007/s00296-016-3524-1
DO - 10.1007/s00296-016-3524-1
M3 - Article
SN - 0172-8172
SP - 1335
EP - 1346
JO - Rheumatology International
JF - Rheumatology International
ER -