Abstract
It has been argued that Xenophon’s Constitution of the Lacedaemonians responded to a number of works on military issues by Spartan authors: Cleon of Halicarnassus’ peri politeias (a speech written for Lysander), Pausanias II’s pamphlet on Lycurgus’ laws, and the less known works of Thibron and Nicocles. The paper aims at emphasizing the prevailing political nature of these works, which were part of the constitutional debate that flourished in Sparta in the period of its hegemony. Furthermore, it proposes Agesilaus as the person who buried the debate: the king, who had chosen to ground his supremacy in feigned submission to Spartan kosmos, as Plutarch highlights, considered this debate to be dangerous for Sparta’s internal balance.
| Titolo tradotto del contributo | Sparta at the beginning of the 4th century: a reformable system? |
|---|---|
| Lingua originale | Italian |
| Titolo della pubblicazione ospite | La cultura a Sparta in età classica (Aristonothos. Scritti per il Mediterraneo antico, 8) |
| Editore | Tangram Edizioni Scientifiche |
| Pagine | 175-193 |
| Numero di pagine | 19 |
| ISBN (stampa) | 978-88-6458-090-6 |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2013 |
Keywords
- Cultura
- Culture
- Fourth Century
- IV secolo
- Sparta
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Sparta agli inizi del IV secolo: un "sistema riformabile"?'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver