Abstract
Conventional agricultural practices (CAP) highly impacted soil functions involved in the provision of multiple\r\necosystem services. No-till (NT) has been repeatedly indicated as a key way to enhance soil fertility and biodiversity,\r\nwhile having a positive effect on the environment and climate change. However, experimental evidence\r\nto date shows contrasting effects of NT on physical parameters of soil fertility, as well as on soil organic\r\ncarbon (SOC) storage and soil biodiversity especially if different soil types and cropping systems are considered.\r\nThe objectives of the present 7-year field study were: (i) to unravel the effect of NT on SOC, soil bulk density,\r\nand water stability index (WSI) of soil aggregates across five different soil types (Silty Clay, Silty Clay Loam, Clay\r\nLoam, Silt Loam, and Sandy Loam) and cropping systems (silage vs grain production), (ii) to examine how soil\r\nfauna (i.e. microarthropods and earthworms) is affected by NT practices under those soil-crop conditions, and\r\n(iii) to assess relationships among responses of soil physical indicators (i.e. soil bulk density and WSI), SOC, and\r\nsoil fauna.\r\nOur results showed that soil bulk density was generally not affected by 7-year NT across all soil types. At the\r\nsame time, NT increased WSI. It follows that NT may increase stable rather than artificial tillage-derived porosity\r\ndue to reduced soil disturbance, and increased SOC and biological activity. However, reduced importance for\r\nboosting aggregates stability should be attributed to NT where initial SOC is high, clay and silt are predominant\r\nsoil fractions, and the rate of crop residue is low.\r\nOur findings suggest that NT may enhance SOC stock (on average 0.66 Mg C ha−1 year−1) in the 0–30 cm soil\r\nlayer. However, we found (i) a tendency of NT to decrease SOC concentration in the 15–30 cm soil layer (on\r\naverage −1.18 g C kg−1), and (ii) no SOC increase induced by NT if crop residues were not left onto the soil\r\nsurface.\r\nNevertheless, NT practices promoted (i) the microarthropods adaptation measured with the QBS-ar index\r\n(105.5 vs 64.7), and (ii) the increase of earthworm abundance (412 vs 123 individuals m−2), which are fundamental\r\nfor enhancing nutrient cycling and soil porosity.\r\nCorrelations among soil fauna (i.e. QBS-ar and earthworm density), soil physical parameters (i.e. soil bulk\r\ndensity and WSI), and SOC (i.e. concentration and stock) corroborates the hypothesis that soil fauna adaptation\r\nand proliferation are main detectors of soil quality and sensitive indicators of changes in soil tillage.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 1-9 |
| Numero di pagine | 9 |
| Rivista | Applied Soil Ecology |
| Volume | 155 |
| Numero di pubblicazione | N/A |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2020 |
OSS delle Nazioni Unite
Questo processo contribuisce al raggiungimento dei seguenti obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile
-
SDG 2 Sconfiggere la fame
-
SDG 13 Lotta contro il cambiamento climatico
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Ecologia
- Scienze Agrarie e Biologiche (varie)
- Scienza del Suolo
Keywords
- Agriculture
- Bulk density
- Earthworms
- QBS-ar
- Soil aggregate stability
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Soil type and cropping system as drivers of soil quality indicators response to no-till: A 7-year field study'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver