TY - JOUR
T1 - Sociodemographic determinants of knowledge on the figure of radiologist: results of a survey in a large university hospital
AU - Cicchetti, Giuseppe
AU - Leoncini, Emanuele
AU - Panic, Nikola
AU - Merlino, Biagio
AU - Boccia, Stefania
AU - Bonomo, Lorenzo
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Background: Despite overlaying an irreplaceable role as a key diagnostic tool in modern
medicine, the role of radiologist still appears to be unclear to patients.
Methods: We conducted a survey in outpatient clinic of Radiological Sciences Department of the
University Hospital “A. Gemelli” in Rome, aiming to assess how correctly patients identify the figure of
the radiologist. The patients were interviewed by the trained physician using structured questionnaire.
Results: We included the number of 259 patients. Majority were female 63.3%, most were 60-69
years old (24.3%), have finished second grade secondary school (35.1%) and were subjected to
magnetic resonance (28.6%) while the least were subjected to mammography (8.1%). Only 38.7%
answered correctly to question No 1 “Who performed your examination?”, and only 30.9% correctly
identified the radiologist as a person interpreting the exam (question No 2 “Who is going to interpret
your radiological examination?”). Overall, 16.8% responded correctly to the both questions.
Significantly less patients with primary school (OR: 0.18, CI 95% 0.06-0.49) and first grade secondary
school (OR: 0.37, CI 95% 0.18-0.75) correctly addressed the question No 1 in compare to those with
second grade secondary school. The first grade secondary education (OR: 0.43, CI 95% 0.20-0.92)
was inversely associated with correct answer to question No 2. Patients with primary education were
significantly less prone to give both correct answers (OR: 0.12, CI 95% 0.02-0.60).
Conclusion: We report insufficient knowledge among patients on radiologist’s role in healthcare
system. The level of knowledge is associated with level of education.
AB - Background: Despite overlaying an irreplaceable role as a key diagnostic tool in modern
medicine, the role of radiologist still appears to be unclear to patients.
Methods: We conducted a survey in outpatient clinic of Radiological Sciences Department of the
University Hospital “A. Gemelli” in Rome, aiming to assess how correctly patients identify the figure of
the radiologist. The patients were interviewed by the trained physician using structured questionnaire.
Results: We included the number of 259 patients. Majority were female 63.3%, most were 60-69
years old (24.3%), have finished second grade secondary school (35.1%) and were subjected to
magnetic resonance (28.6%) while the least were subjected to mammography (8.1%). Only 38.7%
answered correctly to question No 1 “Who performed your examination?”, and only 30.9% correctly
identified the radiologist as a person interpreting the exam (question No 2 “Who is going to interpret
your radiological examination?”). Overall, 16.8% responded correctly to the both questions.
Significantly less patients with primary school (OR: 0.18, CI 95% 0.06-0.49) and first grade secondary
school (OR: 0.37, CI 95% 0.18-0.75) correctly addressed the question No 1 in compare to those with
second grade secondary school. The first grade secondary education (OR: 0.43, CI 95% 0.20-0.92)
was inversely associated with correct answer to question No 2. Patients with primary education were
significantly less prone to give both correct answers (OR: 0.12, CI 95% 0.02-0.60).
Conclusion: We report insufficient knowledge among patients on radiologist’s role in healthcare
system. The level of knowledge is associated with level of education.
KW - knowledge
KW - radiologist
KW - survey
KW - knowledge
KW - radiologist
KW - survey
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/71617
U2 - 10.2427/11184
DO - 10.2427/11184
M3 - Article
SN - 2282-2305
VL - 12
SP - 1
EP - 5
JO - Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health
JF - Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health
ER -