TY - JOUR
T1 - - SKELETAL, DENTAL AND PROFILOMETRIC EFFECTS OF SABBAGH UNIVERSAL SPRING 2 (SUS2) IN A PATIENT AT THE END OF GROWTH: CASE REPORT
AU - Marchionni, Pierdavide
AU - Di Bari, Roberto
AU - Sferra, Simone
AU - Grippaudo, Cristina
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - ABSTRACT
Introduction: Malocclusions, which present a severe skeletal component, are difficult to solve through orthodontic treatment in
patients at the end of growth and often require a combined orthodontic-surgical treatment. The mandibular propulsion appliances
“no compliance” now offer new possibilities for functional orthopedic treatment in borderline cases.
Case presentation: A patient at the end of growth with a severe malocclusion (Class II Division 1), open bite with arches’ transversal
discrepancy, refused the hypothesis of an orthodontic-surgical treatment, which represents the gold standard in such occlusal and
skeletal problems, especially in subjects at the end of growth; consequently, a complex orthopedic-orthodontic treatment was chosen
as the second choice. The patient has been successfully treated also through the use of SUS2 (Sabbagh Universal Spring 2; Dentaurum,
Ispringen, Germany), a “no compliance” fixed functional appliance, wich carried out a significant sagittal correction.
Conclusion: The case report especially highlights the important sagittal correction obtained through the use of SUS2. The SUS2 had
a functional outcome, which resulted in the maxillary growth stop and an effective sagittal mandibular growth increase. The SUS2
effects, enhanced by elastics biomechanics, led to the bite closure and at the achievement of Class I occlusion.
AB - ABSTRACT
Introduction: Malocclusions, which present a severe skeletal component, are difficult to solve through orthodontic treatment in
patients at the end of growth and often require a combined orthodontic-surgical treatment. The mandibular propulsion appliances
“no compliance” now offer new possibilities for functional orthopedic treatment in borderline cases.
Case presentation: A patient at the end of growth with a severe malocclusion (Class II Division 1), open bite with arches’ transversal
discrepancy, refused the hypothesis of an orthodontic-surgical treatment, which represents the gold standard in such occlusal and
skeletal problems, especially in subjects at the end of growth; consequently, a complex orthopedic-orthodontic treatment was chosen
as the second choice. The patient has been successfully treated also through the use of SUS2 (Sabbagh Universal Spring 2; Dentaurum,
Ispringen, Germany), a “no compliance” fixed functional appliance, wich carried out a significant sagittal correction.
Conclusion: The case report especially highlights the important sagittal correction obtained through the use of SUS2. The SUS2 had
a functional outcome, which resulted in the maxillary growth stop and an effective sagittal mandibular growth increase. The SUS2
effects, enhanced by elastics biomechanics, led to the bite closure and at the achievement of Class I occlusion.
KW - Class II malocclusion
KW - no compliance
KW - Class II malocclusion
KW - no compliance
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/74931
M3 - Article
SN - 1849-5249
VL - 2016
SP - 18
EP - 23
JO - SOUTH EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL RESEARCH
JF - SOUTH EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL RESEARCH
ER -