TY - JOUR
T1 - Simulation-Based Decision Support for Agrivoltaic Systems
AU - Bellone, Yuri
AU - Croci, Michele
AU - Impollonia, Giorgio
AU - Nik Zad, Amirhossein
AU - Colauzzi, Michele
AU - Campana, Pietro Elia
AU - Amaducci, Stefano
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - In this study, a framework to compare the performances of different agrivoltaic systems, or agriphotovoltaic systems, in a range of environments was developed and tested. A set of key performance indicators derived from simulations was combined in a multi criteria decision analysis approach. The agriphotovoltaic systems were then ranked based on their similarity to the optimal solution for a specific environment. Main key performance indicators were crop ratio, energy conversion per hectare, specific energy yield, water use efficiency, and initial capital expenditure. Four agriphotovoltaics, namely vertical, interspace mono -axial, overhead mono -axial, and an overhead bi-axial, with five pitch width for each agriphotovoltaic and cultivated with processing tomato, were modelled across five sites (from the North to the South of Italy) during a ten-year period. The different scenarios were simulated in Scilab, in which a radiation model and GECROS crop model were coded. Global irradiation distribution beneath modules, and thus crop yield, were more homogeneous in vertical and overhead mono -axial than in the other agriphotovoltaic. Processing tomato demonstrated high adaptability to shading and yield was marginally affected in most of the agriphotovoltaic system alternatives. Vertical and overhead mono -axial accounted for the least yield reduction when the same pitch is compared. Overall, overhead mono -axial APV with 6 m pitch ranked first in each site when a 0.7 crop ratio threshold was considered. This framework could serve as a valuable tool for assessing the performance of different solution of agriphotovoltaics systems and their compliance with national regulation, and economic and technical targets.
AB - In this study, a framework to compare the performances of different agrivoltaic systems, or agriphotovoltaic systems, in a range of environments was developed and tested. A set of key performance indicators derived from simulations was combined in a multi criteria decision analysis approach. The agriphotovoltaic systems were then ranked based on their similarity to the optimal solution for a specific environment. Main key performance indicators were crop ratio, energy conversion per hectare, specific energy yield, water use efficiency, and initial capital expenditure. Four agriphotovoltaics, namely vertical, interspace mono -axial, overhead mono -axial, and an overhead bi-axial, with five pitch width for each agriphotovoltaic and cultivated with processing tomato, were modelled across five sites (from the North to the South of Italy) during a ten-year period. The different scenarios were simulated in Scilab, in which a radiation model and GECROS crop model were coded. Global irradiation distribution beneath modules, and thus crop yield, were more homogeneous in vertical and overhead mono -axial than in the other agriphotovoltaic. Processing tomato demonstrated high adaptability to shading and yield was marginally affected in most of the agriphotovoltaic system alternatives. Vertical and overhead mono -axial accounted for the least yield reduction when the same pitch is compared. Overall, overhead mono -axial APV with 6 m pitch ranked first in each site when a 0.7 crop ratio threshold was considered. This framework could serve as a valuable tool for assessing the performance of different solution of agriphotovoltaics systems and their compliance with national regulation, and economic and technical targets.
KW - Agrivoltaic
KW - APV
KW - Irradiation distribution
KW - Crop model
KW - Processing tomato
KW - MCDA
KW - Agrivoltaic
KW - APV
KW - Irradiation distribution
KW - Crop model
KW - Processing tomato
KW - MCDA
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/297717
U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123490
DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123490
M3 - Article
SN - 0306-2619
VL - 369
SP - 1
EP - 20
JO - Applied Energy
JF - Applied Energy
ER -