Abstract
Kidney stones are a common condition with high direct and indirect costs; to date, the optimal urological approach for some particular presentations including non-lower pole kidney stones between 10 and 20 mm of diameter is not clear. A limited number of randomized controlled trials and observational longitudinal studies suggests that ureterorenoscopy (URS) could be superior to shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) in achieving stone-free rates in this setting; however, such reports are generally weakened by a number of limitations including small sample size and scarce control for confounding. In this issue, Fankhauser et al. [1] report the results of a large observational retrospective study on the comparative efficacy and safety of URS and SWL for the treatment of previously untreated kidney stones.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | 362-363 |
Numero di pagine | 2 |
Rivista | CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL |
Volume | 11 |
DOI | |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2018 |
Keywords
- endourology
- lithotripsy
- nephrolithiasis
- observational studies
- outcomes