Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacodynamics of Tremelimumab Plus Durvalumab for Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Randomized Expansion of a Phase I/II Study

Robin Kate Kelley, Bruno Sangro, William Harris, Masafumi Ikeda, Takuji Okusaka, Yoon-Koo Kang, Shukui Qin, David W.-M. Tai, Ho Yeong Lim, Thomas Yau, Wei-Peng Yong, Ann-Lii Cheng, Antonio Gasbarrini, Silvia Damian, Jordi Bruix, Mitesh Borad, Johanna Bendell, Tae-You Kim, Nathan Standifer, Philip HeMallory Makowsky, Alejandra Negro, Masatoshi Kudo, Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo

Abstract

PURPOSE This phase I/II study evaluated tremelimumab (anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen-4 monoclonal antibody) and durvalumab (antiprogrammed death ligand-1 monoclonal antibody) as monotherapies and in combination for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including a novel regimen featuring a single, priming dose of tremelimumab (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02519348). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with HCC who had progressed on, were intolerant to, or refused sorafenib were randomly assigned to receive T300 1 D (tremelimumab 300 mg plus durvalumab 1,500 mg [one dose each during the first cycle] followed by durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks), durvalumab monotherapy (1,500 mg once every 4 weeks), tremelimumab monotherapy (750 mg once every 4 weeks [seven doses] and then once every 12 weeks), or T75 1 D (tremelimumab 75 mg once every 4 weeks plus durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks [four doses] followed by durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks). Safety was the primary end point. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 and overall survival; exploratory end points included circulating lymphocyte profiles. RESULTS A total of 332 patients were enrolled (T300 1 D, n 5 75; durvalumab, n 5 104; tremelimumab, n 5 69; and T75 1 D, n 5 84). Tolerability was acceptable across arms, with grade $ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurring in 37.8%, 20.8%, 43.5%, and 24.4%, respectively. Confirmed ORRs (95% CI) were 24.0% (14.9 to 35.3), 10.6% (5.4 to 18.1), 7.2% (2.4 to 16.1), and 9.5% (4.2 to 17.9), respectively. An early expansion of CD81 lymphocytes was associated with response across arms, with highest proliferating CD81 lymphocyte levels occurring in the T300 1 D arm. The median (95% CI) overall survival was 18.7 (10.8 to 27.3), 13.6 (8.7 to 17.6), 15.1 (11.3 to 20.5), and 11.3 (8.4 to 15.0) months in the T300 1 D, durvalumab, tremelimumab, and T75 1 D arms, respectively. CONCLUSION All regimens were found to be tolerable and clinically active; however, the T300 1 D regimen demonstrated the most encouraging benefit-risk profile. The unique pharmacodynamic activity and association with ORR of the T300 1 D regimen further support its continued evaluation in HCC.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)2991-3001
Numero di pagine11
RivistaJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume39
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2021

Keywords

  • Aged, 80 and over Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / pharmacology

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacodynamics of Tremelimumab Plus Durvalumab for Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Randomized Expansion of a Phase I/II Study'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo