TY - JOUR
T1 - Rufinamide for the treatment of refractory epilepsy secondary to neuronal migration disorders
AU - Cusmai, Raffaella
AU - Verrotti, Alberto
AU - Moavero, Romina
AU - Curatolo, Paolo
AU - Battaglia, Domenica Immacolata
AU - Matricardi, Sara
AU - Spalice, Alberto
AU - Vigevano, Federico
AU - Pruna, Dario
AU - Parisi, Pasquale
AU - D'Aniello, Alfredo
AU - Di Gennaro, Giancarlo
AU - Coppola, Giangennaro
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of add-on rufinamide in children with refractory epilepsy symptomatic of neuronal migration disorders.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
We recruited 69 patients in a prospective, open-label, add-on treatment study from six Italian and one German centers for pediatric and adolescent epilepsy care according to the following criteria: age 3 or above; focal or generalized seizures refractory to at least three previous antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), alone or in combination, secondary to neuronal migration disorders; two or more seizures per month in the last 6 months; use of another AED, but no more than three, at baseline. Informed consent from parents and/or caregivers was obtained at the time of enrollment.
RESULTS:
We enrolled 69 patients with a mean age of 15 years (range 3-43). Forty-three patients (62%) had a 50-99% seizure reduction, and two (3%) became seizure-free. Seizure frequency was unchanged in 18 (26%) and worsened in 6 (8.7%). Twenty-nine patients (42%) reported adverse side effects, whilst taking rufinamide. Irritability was the most common side effect (11 patients), followed by decreased appetite (10), mood shift (6), vomiting (5), drowsiness (4), and decreased attention (2). Blood levels of concomitant anticonvulsive drugs were transiently abnormal in 5 patients.
CONCLUSION:
In our population of severely refractory epilepsy due to neuronal migration disorders, rufinamide appeared to be effective and generally well tolerated.
AB - To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of add-on rufinamide in children with refractory epilepsy symptomatic of neuronal migration disorders.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
We recruited 69 patients in a prospective, open-label, add-on treatment study from six Italian and one German centers for pediatric and adolescent epilepsy care according to the following criteria: age 3 or above; focal or generalized seizures refractory to at least three previous antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), alone or in combination, secondary to neuronal migration disorders; two or more seizures per month in the last 6 months; use of another AED, but no more than three, at baseline. Informed consent from parents and/or caregivers was obtained at the time of enrollment.
RESULTS:
We enrolled 69 patients with a mean age of 15 years (range 3-43). Forty-three patients (62%) had a 50-99% seizure reduction, and two (3%) became seizure-free. Seizure frequency was unchanged in 18 (26%) and worsened in 6 (8.7%). Twenty-nine patients (42%) reported adverse side effects, whilst taking rufinamide. Irritability was the most common side effect (11 patients), followed by decreased appetite (10), mood shift (6), vomiting (5), drowsiness (4), and decreased attention (2). Blood levels of concomitant anticonvulsive drugs were transiently abnormal in 5 patients.
CONCLUSION:
In our population of severely refractory epilepsy due to neuronal migration disorders, rufinamide appeared to be effective and generally well tolerated.
KW - Rufinamide refractory epilepsy
KW - Rufinamide refractory epilepsy
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/63444
U2 - 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.01.013
DO - 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.01.013
M3 - Article
SN - 0920-1211
VL - 108
SP - 542
EP - 546
JO - Epilepsy Research
JF - Epilepsy Research
ER -