TY - JOUR
T1 - Robotic versus transanal total mesorectal excision in sexual, anorectal, and urinary function: a multicenter, prospective, observational study
AU - Grass, Julia-Kristin
AU - Persiani, Roberto
AU - Tirelli, Flavio
AU - Chen, Chien-Chih
AU - Caricato, Marco
AU - Pecorino, Alice
AU - Lang, Isabelle J.
AU - Kemper, Marius
AU - Izbicki, Jakob R.
AU - Melling, Nathaniel
AU - Perez, Daniel
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Purpose: Improved long-term survival after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer highlights the importance of functional outcome. Urogenital and anorectal dysfunction is frequently reported after conventional LAR. Advanced minimally invasive techniques such as robotic (RoTME) and transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) might improve functional results by precisely dissecting and preserving autonomic nerves. We compared functional outcomes after RoTME or TaTME in a multicenter study. Methods: One hundred twenty patients (55 RoTME/65 TaTME) were prospectively included in four participating centers. Anorectal (Wexner and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) Score), urinary (International Consultation on Incontinence—Male/Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Score (ICIQ-MLUTS/ICIQ-FLUTS) and International Prostate Symptom Scale (IPSS)), and sexual (International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)) outcomes at 12 months after surgery were compared to preoperative scores. The response rate to the 1-year postoperative functional assessment by questionnaire was 79.5%. Results: RoTME enabled better anorectal function compared to TaTME (LARS score 4.3 ± 2.2 vs. 9.8 ± 1.5, p = 0.038, respectively). TaTME proved superior at preserving male urinary function, while female urinary function was comparable in both groups, with only mild postoperative impairment (RoTME vs. TaTME, respectively: ICIQ-MLUTS 13.8 ± 4.9 vs. 1.8 ± 5.8, p = 0.038; ICIQ-FLUTS Incontinence Score − 0.3 ± 1.0 vs. − 0.2 ± 0.9, p = 0.844). Both techniques demonstrated comparable male (RoTME − 13.4 ± 2.7 vs. TaTME − 11.7 ± 3.4, p = 0.615) and female (RoTME 5.2 ± 4.6 vs. TaTME 10.5 ± 6.4, p = 0.254) sexual function. Conclusion: After adjustment for risk factors, RoTME provided better anorectal functional results, whereas TaTME was better at preserving male urinary function. Overall, both techniques demonstrated only mild postoperative functional impairment.
AB - Purpose: Improved long-term survival after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer highlights the importance of functional outcome. Urogenital and anorectal dysfunction is frequently reported after conventional LAR. Advanced minimally invasive techniques such as robotic (RoTME) and transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) might improve functional results by precisely dissecting and preserving autonomic nerves. We compared functional outcomes after RoTME or TaTME in a multicenter study. Methods: One hundred twenty patients (55 RoTME/65 TaTME) were prospectively included in four participating centers. Anorectal (Wexner and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) Score), urinary (International Consultation on Incontinence—Male/Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Score (ICIQ-MLUTS/ICIQ-FLUTS) and International Prostate Symptom Scale (IPSS)), and sexual (International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)) outcomes at 12 months after surgery were compared to preoperative scores. The response rate to the 1-year postoperative functional assessment by questionnaire was 79.5%. Results: RoTME enabled better anorectal function compared to TaTME (LARS score 4.3 ± 2.2 vs. 9.8 ± 1.5, p = 0.038, respectively). TaTME proved superior at preserving male urinary function, while female urinary function was comparable in both groups, with only mild postoperative impairment (RoTME vs. TaTME, respectively: ICIQ-MLUTS 13.8 ± 4.9 vs. 1.8 ± 5.8, p = 0.038; ICIQ-FLUTS Incontinence Score − 0.3 ± 1.0 vs. − 0.2 ± 0.9, p = 0.844). Both techniques demonstrated comparable male (RoTME − 13.4 ± 2.7 vs. TaTME − 11.7 ± 3.4, p = 0.615) and female (RoTME 5.2 ± 4.6 vs. TaTME 10.5 ± 6.4, p = 0.254) sexual function. Conclusion: After adjustment for risk factors, RoTME provided better anorectal functional results, whereas TaTME was better at preserving male urinary function. Overall, both techniques demonstrated only mild postoperative functional impairment.
KW - Functional outcome
KW - Transanal Endoscopic Surgery
KW - Robotic total mesorectal excision
KW - Transanal total mesorectal excision
KW - Urogenital function
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Postoperative Complications
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Rectum
KW - Syndrome
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Laparoscopy
KW - Rectal Neoplasms
KW - Robotic Surgical Procedures
KW - Low anterior resection syndrome
KW - Functional outcome
KW - Transanal Endoscopic Surgery
KW - Robotic total mesorectal excision
KW - Transanal total mesorectal excision
KW - Urogenital function
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Postoperative Complications
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Rectum
KW - Syndrome
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Laparoscopy
KW - Rectal Neoplasms
KW - Robotic Surgical Procedures
KW - Low anterior resection syndrome
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/297456
U2 - 10.1007/s00384-021-04030-5
DO - 10.1007/s00384-021-04030-5
M3 - Article
SN - 0179-1958
VL - 36
SP - 2749
EP - 2761
JO - International Journal of Colorectal Disease
JF - International Journal of Colorectal Disease
ER -