TY - JOUR
T1 - Robotic Single-Port Platform in General, Urologic, and Gynecologic Surgeries: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis
AU - Cianci, S.
AU - Rosati, A.
AU - Rumolo, V.
AU - Gueli Alletti, Salvatore
AU - Gallotta, Valerio
AU - Turco, L. C.
AU - Corrado, G.
AU - Vizzielli, Giuseppe
AU - Fagotti, Anna
AU - Fanfani, Francesco
AU - Scambia, Giovanni
AU - Uccella, S.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background: Robotic platforms have recently acquired progressive importance in different surgical fields, such as urology, gynecology, and general surgery. Through the years, new surgical robots have become available as single-port robotic platform. The study is aimed to value the single-port robotic platform characteristics in different surgical specialties. Methods: The terms “LESS” OR “single port” OR “single site” AND “robot” OR “robotic” were systematically used to search the PubMed and Scopus databases. A total of 57 studies were considered eligible for the present review. The articles included were divided according to the surgical field in which the study was conducted: General surgery (29 articles), Gynecology (18 articles), Urology (10 articles). Results: Most part of the articles showed the feasibility of robotic single-port surgical procedures and described advantages in terms of cosmetic, hospital stay, and in some series even cost reduction. A meta-analysis was conducted, showing a significant increment of complications using RSP if compared with SLPS and a trend (P = 0.008) when RSP was compared with LESS. The comparison of different techniques in terms of conversion to laparotomy did not show any significant difference. Conclusion: Robotic single port potentially furnishes an important surgical and post-operatory improvement; however, some limits still prolong the surgical time and complication rate.
AB - Background: Robotic platforms have recently acquired progressive importance in different surgical fields, such as urology, gynecology, and general surgery. Through the years, new surgical robots have become available as single-port robotic platform. The study is aimed to value the single-port robotic platform characteristics in different surgical specialties. Methods: The terms “LESS” OR “single port” OR “single site” AND “robot” OR “robotic” were systematically used to search the PubMed and Scopus databases. A total of 57 studies were considered eligible for the present review. The articles included were divided according to the surgical field in which the study was conducted: General surgery (29 articles), Gynecology (18 articles), Urology (10 articles). Results: Most part of the articles showed the feasibility of robotic single-port surgical procedures and described advantages in terms of cosmetic, hospital stay, and in some series even cost reduction. A meta-analysis was conducted, showing a significant increment of complications using RSP if compared with SLPS and a trend (P = 0.008) when RSP was compared with LESS. The comparison of different techniques in terms of conversion to laparotomy did not show any significant difference. Conclusion: Robotic single port potentially furnishes an important surgical and post-operatory improvement; however, some limits still prolong the surgical time and complication rate.
KW - Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
KW - Humans
KW - Robotic Surgical Procedures
KW - Surgical Procedures, Operative
KW - Urologic Surgical Procedures
KW - Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
KW - Humans
KW - Robotic Surgical Procedures
KW - Surgical Procedures, Operative
KW - Urologic Surgical Procedures
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/167332
U2 - 10.1007/s00268-019-05049-0
DO - 10.1007/s00268-019-05049-0
M3 - Article
SN - 0364-2313
VL - 43
SP - 2401
EP - 2419
JO - World Journal of Surgery
JF - World Journal of Surgery
ER -