TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk to plant health of Flavescence dorée for the EU territory
AU - Jeger, Michael
AU - Bragard, Claude
AU - Caffier, David
AU - Candresse, Thierry
AU - Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
AU - Dehnen-Schmutz, Katharina
AU - Gilioli, Gianni
AU - Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
AU - Macleod, Alan
AU - Navarro, Maria Navajas
AU - Niere, Björn
AU - Parnell, Stephen
AU - Potting, Roel
AU - Rafoss, Trond
AU - Rossi, Vittorio
AU - Urek, Gregor
AU - Van Bruggen, Ariena
AU - Van Der Werf, Wopke
AU - West, Jonathan
AU - Winter, Stephan
AU - Bosco, Domenico
AU - Foissac, Xavier
AU - Strauss, Gudrun
AU - Hollo, Gabor
AU - Mosbach-Schulz, Olaf
AU - Grégoire, Jean-Claude
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH) performed
a quantitative analysis of the risk posed by the Flavescence dorée phytoplasma (FDp) in the EU
territory. Three scenarios were analysed, one with current measures in place (scenario A0), one
designed to improve grapevine propagation material phytosanitary status (scenario A1) and one with
reinforced eradication and containment (scenario A2). The potential for entry is limited, FDp being
almost non-existent outside the EU. FDp and its major vector, Scaphoideus titanus, have already
established over large parts of the EU and have the potential to establish in a large fraction of the
currently unaffected EU territory. With the current measures in place (A0), spread of FDp is predicted
to continue with a progression of between a few and ca 20 newly infested NUTS 2 regions during the
next 10 years, illustrating the limitations of the current control measures against spread. FDp spread is
predicted to be roughly similar between scenarios A1 and A2, but more restricted than under scenario
A0. However, even with reinforced control scenarios, stabilisation or reduction in the number of
infested NUTS 2 regions has only relatively low probability. Under scenario A0, FDp has a 0.5–1%
impact on the overall EU grapes and wine production, reflecting the effectiveness of the current
control measures against impact. Under both scenarios A1 and A2, FDp impact is predicted to be
reduced, by approximately one-third (A1) to two-thirds (A2) as compared to A0, but the associated
uncertainties are large. The generalised use of hot water treatment for planting material produced in
infected zones has the most important contribution to FDp impact reduction in scenario A1 and has
high feasibility. Both increased eradication and containment measures contribute to impact reduction
under scenario A2 but the overall feasibility is lower.
AB - Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH) performed
a quantitative analysis of the risk posed by the Flavescence dorée phytoplasma (FDp) in the EU
territory. Three scenarios were analysed, one with current measures in place (scenario A0), one
designed to improve grapevine propagation material phytosanitary status (scenario A1) and one with
reinforced eradication and containment (scenario A2). The potential for entry is limited, FDp being
almost non-existent outside the EU. FDp and its major vector, Scaphoideus titanus, have already
established over large parts of the EU and have the potential to establish in a large fraction of the
currently unaffected EU territory. With the current measures in place (A0), spread of FDp is predicted
to continue with a progression of between a few and ca 20 newly infested NUTS 2 regions during the
next 10 years, illustrating the limitations of the current control measures against spread. FDp spread is
predicted to be roughly similar between scenarios A1 and A2, but more restricted than under scenario
A0. However, even with reinforced control scenarios, stabilisation or reduction in the number of
infested NUTS 2 regions has only relatively low probability. Under scenario A0, FDp has a 0.5–1%
impact on the overall EU grapes and wine production, reflecting the effectiveness of the current
control measures against impact. Under both scenarios A1 and A2, FDp impact is predicted to be
reduced, by approximately one-third (A1) to two-thirds (A2) as compared to A0, but the associated
uncertainties are large. The generalised use of hot water treatment for planting material produced in
infected zones has the most important contribution to FDp impact reduction in scenario A1 and has
high feasibility. Both increased eradication and containment measures contribute to impact reduction
under scenario A2 but the overall feasibility is lower.
KW - European Union
KW - FDp
KW - Flavescence dorée phytoplasma
KW - Scaphoideus titanus
KW - Vitis
KW - grapevine
KW - quantitative pest risk assessment
KW - risk reduction options
KW - risk reduction scenarios
KW - European Union
KW - FDp
KW - Flavescence dorée phytoplasma
KW - Scaphoideus titanus
KW - Vitis
KW - grapevine
KW - quantitative pest risk assessment
KW - risk reduction options
KW - risk reduction scenarios
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/93787
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4603
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4603
M3 - Article
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 14
SP - 1
EP - 83
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
ER -